I am trying to write an update statement, which utilizes the result of a series of aggregations of with
statement as below.
update final_table
set(destination_col1,destination_col2)=
(
select c4,c5
from
(
with temp_table1(c1,c2,c3) as
select c7,c7,c9 from source_table,
temp_table2(c4,c5,c6) as
select "some aggregation on c1,c2",c3 from temp_table
select * from temp_table2
)
where c6= final_table.primary_key
);
This runs forever.
Whereas, when I try to break the same into 2 queries it works.
- Creating a table using the inner query.
-
Use the above-created table to update like,
update final_table set(destination_col1,destination_col2)= (select c4,c5 from step1_table where c6=final_table.primary_key)
As suggested here, I tried to check if there are any locks. But I don't have any.
Am I abusing the with statement
? Why exactly my expectation is not met?
Best Answer
No, you are abusing the UPDATE statement. With an UPDATE statement, the correlated subquery is executed for each row from final_table.
Updating values from an other table should be typically done with MERGE.
Example: