Shell – What does exit 99 means

exitshell

I want to know what is exit 99 and why would one use it and what are the significance uses of it.

For example, I'm using exit 99.

Best Answer

There is no significance to exiting with code 99, other than there is perhaps in the context of a specific program.

Either way, exit exits the shell with a certain exit code, in this case, 99. You can find more information in help exit:

exit: exit [n]
    Exit the shell.

    Exits the shell with a status of N.  If N is omitted, the exit status
    is that of the last command executed.

Related Solutions

Bash Functions – Return and Exit Values

You can use any number between 0 to 255 except for reserved exit codes (click here to know more)

Shell Script – Why Does (exit 1) Not Exit the Script?

() runs commands in the subshell, so by exit you are exiting from subshell and returning to the parent shell. Use braces {} if you want to run commands in the current shell.

From bash manual:

(list) list is executed in a subshell environment. Variable assignments and builtin commands that affect the shell's environment do not remain in effect after the command completes. The return status is the exit status of list.

{ list; } list is simply executed in the current shell environment. list must be terminated with a newline or semicolon. This is known as a group command. The return status is the exit status of list. Note that unlike the metacharacters ( and ), { and } are reserved words and must occur where a reserved word is permitted to be recognized. Since they do not cause a word break, they must be separated from list by whitespace or another shell metacharacter.

It's worth mentioning that the shell syntax is quite consistent and the subshell participates also in the other () constructs like command substitution (also with the old-style `..` syntax) or process substitution, so the following won't exit from the current shell either:

echo $(exit)
cat <(exit)

While it may be obvious that subshells are involved when commands are placed explicitly inside (), the less visible fact is that they are also spawned in these other structures:

command started in the background
```
exit &
```
doesn't exit the current shell because (after man bash)

If a command is terminated by the control operator &, the shell executes the command in the background in a subshell. The shell does not wait for the command to finish, and the return status is 0.
the pipeline
```
exit | echo foo
```
still exits only from the subshell.

However different shells behave differently in this regard. For example bash puts all components of the pipeline into separate subshells (unless you use the lastpipe option in invocations where job control is not enabled), but AT&T ksh and zsh run the last part inside the current shell (both behaviours are allowed by POSIX). Thus
```
exit | exit | exit
```
does basically nothing in bash, but exits from the zsh because of the last exit.
coproc exit also runs exit in a subshell.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Bash Functions – Return and Exit Values

Shell Script – Why Does (exit 1) Not Exit the Script?

Related Question