Concering your second question, if you make the symlink using a relative path and then move the whole directory structure, it still should work. Consider the following terminal session:
~$ mkdir test
~$ cd test/
~/test$ mkdir test2
~/test$ cd test2/
~/test/test2$ touch testfile; echo "hello, world" > testfile
~/test/test2$ cat testfile
hello, world
~/test/test2$ cd ..
~/test$ ln -s ./test2/testfile testfileln
~/test$ ls -l
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 xxxx xxxx 4096 2010-09-09 09:18 test2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 xxxx xxxx 16 2010-09-09 09:18 testfileln -> ./test2/testfile
~/test$ cd ..
~$ mv test/ testfoo
~$ cd testfoo/
~/testfoo$ ls -l
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 xxxx xxxx 4096 2010-09-09 09:18 test2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 xxxx xxxx 16 2010-09-09 09:18 testfileln -> ./test2/testfile
/testfoo$ cat testfileln
hello, world
As for your first question, if you really want a link that will refer to the same file no matter what you do with the original location of the file, a hard link is probably what you want. A hard link is basically just another name refering to the same inode. Thus, there is no difference between the hard link and the "original file." However, if you need to link across file systems, hard links often do not work and you usually cannot make hard links to directories. Further, you will notice some differences when performing some file operations. Most notably, removing the original will not remove the file. The hard link will still point to the file and be accessible.
A file is an inode with meta data among which a list of pointers to where to find the data.
In order to be able to access a file, you have to link it to a directory (think of directories as phone directories, not folders), that is add one or more entries to one of more directories to associate a name with that file.
All those links, those file names point to the same file. There's not one that is the original and the other ones that are links. They are all access points to the same file (same inode) in the directory tree. When you get the size of the file (lstat system call), you're retrieving information (that metadata referred to above) stored in the inode, it doesn't matter which file name, which link you're using to refer to that file.
By contrast symlinks are another file (another inode) whose content is a path to the target file. Like any other file, those symlinks have to be linked to a directory (must have a name) so you can access them. You can also have several links to a symlinks, or in other words, symlinks can be given several names (in one or more directories).
$ touch a
$ ln a b
$ ln -s a c
$ ln c d
$ ls -li [a-d]
10486707 -rw-r--r-- 2 stephane stephane 0 Aug 27 17:05 a
10486707 -rw-r--r-- 2 stephane stephane 0 Aug 27 17:05 b
10502404 lrwxrwxrwx 2 stephane stephane 1 Aug 27 17:05 c -> a
10502404 lrwxrwxrwx 2 stephane stephane 1 Aug 27 17:05 d -> a
Above the file number 10486707 is a regular file. Two entries in the current directory (one with name a, one with name b) link to it. Because the link count is 2, we know there's no other name of that file in the current directory or any other directory. File number 10502404 is another file, this time of type symlink linked twice to the current directory. Its content (target) is the relative path "a".
Note that if 10502404 was linked to another directory than the current one, it would typically point to a different file depending on how it was accessed.
$ mkdir 1 2
$ echo foo > 1/a
$ echo bar > 2/a
$ ln -s a 1/b
$ ln 1/b 2/b
$ ls -lia 1 2
1:
total 92
10608644 drwxr-xr-x 2 stephane stephane 4096 Aug 27 17:26 ./
10485761 drwxrwxr-x 443 stephane stephane 81920 Aug 27 17:26 ../
10504186 -rw-r--r-- 1 stephane stephane 4 Aug 27 17:24 a
10539259 lrwxrwxrwx 2 stephane stephane 1 Aug 27 17:26 b -> a
2:
total 92
10608674 drwxr-xr-x 2 stephane stephane 4096 Aug 27 17:26 ./
10485761 drwxrwxr-x 443 stephane stephane 81920 Aug 27 17:26 ../
10539044 -rw-r--r-- 1 stephane stephane 4 Aug 27 17:24 a
10539259 lrwxrwxrwx 2 stephane stephane 1 Aug 27 17:26 b -> a
$ cat 1/b
foo
$ cat 2/b
bar
Files have no names associated with them other than in the directories that link them. The space taken by their names is the entries in those directories, it's accounted for in the file size/disk usage of the directories.
You'll notice that the system call to remove a file is unlink. That is, you don't remove files, you unlink them from the directories they're referenced in. Once unlinked from the last directory that had an entry to a given file, that file is then destroyed (as long as no process has it opened).
Best Answer
Jim's answer explains how to test for a symlink: by using
test's-Ltest.But testing for a "hard link" is, well, strictly speaking not what you want. Hard links work because of how Unix handles files: each file is represented by a single inode. Then a single inode has zero or more names or directory entries or, technically, hard links (what you're calling a "file").
Thankfully, the
statcommand, where available, can tell you how many names an inode has.So you're looking for something like this (here assuming the GNU or busybox implementation of
stat):The
-c '%h'bit tellsstatto just output the number of hardlinks to the inode, i.e., the number of names the file has.-gt 1then checks if that is more than 1.Note that symlinks, just like any other files, can also be linked to several directories so you can have several hardlinks to one symlink.