I have installed a 32 bit RHEL OS on a 64 bit system.
From the wiki page of PAE:
The Linux kernel includes full PAE mode support starting with version
2.3.23, with Linus Torvalds mentioning PAE's 4 MB page support in 1.3.15,[18] enabling access of up to 64 GB of memory on 32-bit machines.
The current kernel version in one of the server is:
2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.i686
Question 1
Does the kernel version mean that if I add another 24 GB RAM to my already existing 8 GB RAM, the entire 32 GB physical memory will become usable?
Currently the system shows that 8 GB RAM is available (I use free
command to check it).
Question 2
I am still confused on the virtual memory concepts.
How will the 32 bit system use the virtual memory?
I read that 32 bit RHEL will use the memory in chunks of 3 GB.
Does this mean, at any point of time, there can be only maximum 3 GB in the main memory?
I thought since I have 32 GB memory at any time 32 GB data can reside in main memory. Particularly, I am trying to understand the answer from here:
Each process runs in its own address space, and being 32-bit restricts
that address space to about 3GB for each process. The sum of the
memory used by 32-bit applications is completely irrelevant. There is
nothing to get around.
Best Answer
Well, I do not expect a concise answer than the one available from here.
The most that the process can address is 4GB. You are potentially confusing memory with address space. A process can have more memory than address space. That is perfectly legal and quite common in video processing and other memory intensive applications. A process can be allocated dozens of GB of memory and swap it into and out of the address space at will. Only 2 GB can go into the user address space at a time.
If you have a four-car garage at your house, you can still own fifty cars. You just can't keep them all in your garage. You have to have auxiliary storage somewhere else to store at least 46 of them; which cars you keep in your garage and which ones you keep in the parking lot down the street is up to you.
Absolutely it does not mean that. A single process could use more memory than that! Again the amount of memory a process uses is almost completely unrelated to the amount of virtual address space a process uses. Just like the number of cars you keep in your garage is completely unrelated to the number of cars you own.
Moreover, two processes can share non-private memory pages. If twenty processes all load the same DLL, the processes all share the memory pages for that code. They don't share virtual memory address space, they share memory.
My point, in case it is not clear, is that you should stop thinking of memory and address space as the same thing, because they're not the same thing at all.
You have fifty cars and a four-car garage, and a 100 car parking lot down the street. You increase the size of the parking lot to 200 spots. Do any of your cars get faster as a result of you now having 150 extra parking spaces instead of 50 extra parking spaces?