POSIXly, the parsing for options should stop at -- or at the first non-option (or non-option-argument) argument whichever comes first. So in

cp -R file1 -t /mybackup file2 -f

that's at file1, so cp should recursively copy all of file1, -t, /mybackup and file2 into the -f directory.

GNU getopt(3) however (that GNU cp uses to parse options (and here you're using GNU cp since you're using the GNU-specific -t option)), unless the $POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable is set, accepts options after arguments. So it is actually equivalent to POSIX option style parsing's:

cp -R -t /mybackup -f -- file1 file2

The getopts shell built-in, even in the GNU shell (bash) only handles the POSIX style. It also doesn't support long options or options with optional arguments.

If you want to parse the options the same way as GNU cp does, you'll need to use the GNU getopt(3) API. For that, if on Linux, you can use the enhanced getopt utility from util-linux (that enhanced version of the getopt command has also been ported to some other Unices like FreeBSD).

That getopt will rearrange the options in a canonical way which allows you to parse it simply with a while/case loop.

$ getopt -n "$0" -o t:Rf -- -Rf file1 -t/mybackup file2
 -R -f -t '/mybackup' -- 'file1' 'file2'

You'd typically use it as:

parsed_options=$(
  getopt -n "$0" -o t:Rf -- "$@"
) || exit
eval "set -- $parsed_options"
while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
  case $1 in
    (-[Rf]) shift;;
    (-t) shift 2;;
    (--) shift; break;;
    (*) exit 1 # should never be reached.
  esac
done
echo "Now, the arguments are $*"

Also note that that getopt will parse options the same way as GNU cp does. In particular, it supports the long options (and entering them abbreviated) and honours the $POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variables (which when set disables support for options after arguments) the same way GNU cp does.

Note that using gdb and printing the arguments that getopt_long() receives can help building the parameters to getopt(1):

(gdb) bt
#0  getopt_long (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffdae8, options=0x4171a6 "abdfHilLnprst:uvxPRS:T", long_options=0x417c20, opt_index=0x0) at getopt1.c:64
(gdb) set print pretty on
(gdb) p *long_options@40
$10 = {{
    name = 0x4171fb "archive",
    has_arg = 0,
    flag = 0x0,
    val = 97
  }, {
    name = 0x417203 "attributes-only",
[...]

Then you can use getopt as:

getopt -n cp -o abdfHilLnprst:uvxPRS:T -l archive... -- "$@"

Remember that GNU cp's list of supported options may change from one version to the next and that getopt will not be able to check if you pass a legal value to the --sparse option for instance.

To begin with, note that argv[0] is not necessarily the program name. It is what the caller puts into argv[0] of the execve system call (e.g. see this question on Stack Overflow). (All other variants of exec are not system calls but interfaces to execve.)

Suppose, for instance, the following (using execl):

execl("/var/tmp/mybackdoor", "top", NULL);

/var/tmp/mybackdoor is what is executed but argv[0] is set to top, and this is what ps or (the real) top would display. See this answer on U&L SE for more on this.

Setting all of this aside: Before the advent of fancy filesystems like /proc, argv[0] was the only way for a process to learn about its own name. What would that be good for?

• Several programs customize their behavior depending on the name by which they were called (usually by symbolic or hard links, for example BusyBox's utilities; several more examples are provided in other answers to this question).
• Moreover, services, daemons and other programs that log through syslog often prepend their name to the log entries; without this, event tracking would become next to infeasible.