There are the commands find
and locate
to search for files on the disk.
I know that find
recursively processes all needed subdirectories to search files and therefore is slow but up-to-date, whereas locate
uses a database that gets updated every now and then (when exactly?) to quickly show results which might be outdated though.
Are there any other differences? In which situations would one prefer the one or the other? And when does the locate
database get updated usually?
Best Answer
locate
is really only good for finding files and displaying them to humans. You can do a few things with it, but I wouldn't trust it enough to parse and —as you say— it's impossible to guarantee the state of the internal database, more so because it's only scheduled to run from/etc/cron.daily/mlocate
, once a day!find
is live. It filters, excludes, executes. It's suitable for parsing. It can output relative paths. It can output full paths. It can do things based on attributes, not just names.locate
certainly has a place in my toolbox but it's usually right at the bottom as a last-ditch effort to find something. It's easier thanfind
too.