I'm planning to buy new computer, but suddenly I found myself confusing regarding hard drives. I want a FAST AND SECURE way to store my data, but at the same time cost effective. This is going to be my workstation/development machine and I am asking this because I always had bottleneck problems with hard drives.
First I was thinking to construct RAID 1+0 or 0+1, but later I found out that RAID 5 can be more cost effective because it only needs 3 drives instead 4, but i don't know about performance gain/hit.
I was also thinking to buy a 60GB SSD hard drive and use it only for Windows installation. All other programs, etc., I would install on another disk and then I also would have a third drive to save static data like downloads, movies, installation files, ISOs, etc.
I am really confused which option to use here, or is there even some better configurations that I am not aware of? Any suggestions?
Best Answer
I like the SSD + large hard drive idea the best: fast OS operation + large storage. For cost savings, you may consider the 10k RPM WD Velociraptor instead of the SSD. For backup, I would use a drive external to the system, either a USB drive or a NAS.
RAID is more trouble than it's worth for this. It's a solution for servers to prevent downtime; typical desktops don't need that. Even mirroring doesn't provide the same advantages that a true backup would.
To address the SSD vs VelociRaptor issues:
Intel X25-M 80GB SATA II SSD, USD 310 (Intel was Anand's recommendation)
Western Digital VelociRaptor 150GB 10k RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s, USD 180
The Intel SSD is almost 2.5 times faster than the VelociRaptor in this particular test. It's also over 3 times more expensive in cost/GB. You'll just have to pick what's more important to you.
For large storage, Ars Technica recommends
Western Digital Caviar 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s, USD 95.
Notes: