Same SSID on router and Access Point

routerwireless-access-pointwireless-extender

I have a L-shaped house with an ASUS router in one end. My problem is that the wifi strength is quite bad in the other end of the house and sometimes even non-existing.

I have a extender/access point (Asus RP-AC52) that I think will solve my problems, I'm not quite sure how to configure it though.

My options are:

  1. Use it as an wireless extender.
  2. Use it as an access point in the other end of the house (a wire is available)

The problem this nr 1 is that it seems to still be too far away. The wifi is still unreliable in the other end of the house.

Options nr 2 seems like the best, but I'm wondering how it works when connected to a wifi router? Can they have the same ssid? Does the access point have it's own dhcp? Can the clients switch network seamlessly?

Thanks!

Best Answer

I felt the need to post an answer too to clear out the small inaccuracies from the other answer. (sorry, not meant to be rude)

You mention two choices.

  1. Use it as extender
  2. Use it as separate accesspoint.

Both solutions have their pro's and cons. Lets list those first.

Use it as an extender

When you setup the device as extender, you will repeat the signal that comes into the device.

The pro is that this allows you to roam through the entire network without losing connection.

The con is that you get less speed as bandwidth is reserved for the connection to the other access point it extends.

Use it as a separate accesspoint

When you setup the device as new accesspoint, a new wifi point is added to the network that devices can connect to.

The pro is that it reduces load on the other wifi points and gets better coverage because the signal is stronger. Also because you run a network cable to that point, speeds get near the max it can be for the entire wifi.

The con is that you will not automatically switch to this wifi which can give weird issues and may appear to not work. This also will give you small dropouts when it switches.

Which is better?

Although the con for the access point is a big one, it still is a better trade off when done correctly.

Keep in mind that even if you use the same SSID and password for both networks, your wifi will still see them as two and will stay connected to the same wifi point until the signal is so weak it disconnects, in which case it automatically switches over to the other network. This unfortunately does mean that you still get slow speeds when you are far away from the first wifi point and still barely in range.

Because both wifi's have the same SSID, you cannot switch yourself manually. It is this exact reason why you want to avoid naming both wifi devices with the same SSID. Give both a different SSID, so you can switch yourself when you want to, or even better, choose to not connect to one of the two networks at all, so you are always connected to either, and choose the one where you need to have wifi coverage the most.

With this in mind, it can be a big win to choose the location of the second accesspoint carefully, so you can make that your main wifi point without connecting to the other and only use the other device in those rare cases when you need it.

You configure this by linking a cable between a LAN port from both the router AND the device that becomes the Access Point. You will want to turn off DHCP though. Let the main device handle that. In the configuration you will have to specify something for the WAN port, it doesn't really matter what this is as long as it is something arbitrary and non-existent, preferably still in the same network range, but not inside the subnet.

By this I mean... Say, you have your network setup as 192.168.10.x, then you will want to put the WAN to 192.168.y.x where y is any number other than 10.

Also, make sure the LAN ipaddress of the Access point is static and set to any number inside the range of the network, but outside of the DHCP range on a free address, so you can manage the device whenever you need to.

Related Question