How much of a real-world performance gain would you expect from:
-
replacing a 5400rpm IDE HD with a 7200rpm IDE HD?
-
replacing a 5400rpm IDE HD with a SATA-150?
It's assumed that the drive in question is both the system drive and the only drive. A modest AMD Sempron-based home computer with adequate DDR memory running Windows XP Home SP3.
Thanks for looking.
Best Answer
In both cases there will definitely be performance gains to see from either. Hard drive performance is a function of a few things, such as:
Today's 1TB+ 7200 RPM hard drives are quite capable of outperforming older 10KRPM server hard drives simply due to the incredible amount of data flying under the drive read/write heads every rotation. Additionally, the price per GB sweet spot lives up in the highest capacity drives.
I believe that at the time of this writing, the greatest platter density is about 500 GB/in^2, which Samsung uses in their Spinpoint drives. These manage enough read/write throughput to actually saturate an ATA133 connection (finally!), so a 1TB+ drive might be choked a little under a SATA150 connection for bursty reads form the disk cache.
Either way I would definitely suggest grabbing a ~$100 USD 1.5 TB drive and connecting it via SATA150. SATA also has the bonus of being the cheaper interface, at the moment; equivalently sized IDE drives tend to carry a bit of a price premium now for being the older, deprecated technology.