Ny benefit to a powerful second video card

graphics cardmultiple-monitors

I've got an NVidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti, and want to add a third monitor to my system, but don't have the cash for another 500-series card for SLI. Given that, is there any advantage of adding a 200-series GTX, over say a GeForce 8800 or something?

I would have thought that the 2nd GPU would run everything that displays on the third monitor, but I have a similar (three monitors, one powerful card, one loser card) setup at work, and when I run furmark, it always maxes out the more powerful GPU no matter which monitor it's displaying on, and the loser GPU sits mostly idle. That makes me think now that upgrading the loser card has no benefit at all, but are there situations where that's not the case?

Best Answer

Of course only one card was maxing out the single GPU, you can't run SLI with different GPU cores.

Save up and get another GTX 560 Ti if you want to increase triple monitor 3D performance too. The only ability you get by adding a lower performance graphics card is the ability to use three monitors, that's it.

You can also use a slower card to perform the PhysX rendering. Also, if you use any CUDA-specific applications, you can offset them to one particular GPU if you needed to.


If your second GPU happens to be SLI-compatible with the first one (as with Crossfire, which only happens when they share the same GPU core), when SLI/Crossfire is enabled, your performance will be limited by the slower card (or rather, the card with a lower amount of memory or lower clock frequency).

Related Question