YOUR QUERY
SELECT post.postid, post.attach FROM newbb_innopost AS post WHERE post.threadid = 51506;
At first glance, that query should only touches 1.1597% (62510 out of 5390146) of the table. It should be fast given the key distribution of threadid 51506.
REALITY CHECK
No matter which version of MySQL (Oracle, Percona, MariaDB) you use, none of them can fight to one enemy they all have in common : The InnoDB Architecture.
CLUSTERED INDEX
Please keep in mind that the each threadid entry has a primary key attached. This means that when you read from the index, it must do a primary key lookup within the ClusteredIndex (internally named gen_clust_index). In the ClusteredIndex, each InnoDB page contains both data and PRIMARY KEY index info. See my post Best of MyISAM and InnoDB for more info.
REDUNDANT INDEXES
You have a lot of clutter in the table because some indexes have the same leading columns. MySQL and InnoDB has to navigate through the index clutter to get to needed BTREE nodes. You should reduced that clutter by running the following:
ALTER TABLE newbb_innopost
DROP INDEX threadid,
DROP INDEX threadid_2,
DROP INDEX threadid_visible_dateline,
ADD INDEX threadid_visible_dateline_index (`threadid`,`visible`,`dateline`,`userid`)
;
Why strip down these indexes ?
- The first three indexes start with threadid
threadid_2
and threadid_visible_dateline
start with the same three columns
threadid_visible_dateline
does not need postid since it's the PRIMARY KEY and it's embedded
BUFFER CACHING
The InnoDB Buffer Pool caches data and index pages. MyISAM only caches index pages.
Just in this area alone, MyISAM does not waste time caching data. That's because it's not designed to cache data. InnoDB caches every data page and index page (and its grandmother) it touches. If your InnoDB Buffer Pool is too small, you could be caching pages, invalidating pages, and removing pages all in one query.
TABLE LAYOUT
You could shave of some space from the row by considering importthreadid
and importpostid
. You have them as BIGINTs. They take up 16 bytes in the ClusteredIndex per row.
You should run this
SELECT importthreadid,importpostid FROM newbb_innopost PROCEDURE ANALYSE();
This will recommend what data types these columns should be for the given dataset.
CONCLUSION
MyISAM has a lot less to contend with than InnoDB, especially in the area of caching.
While you revealed the amount of RAM (32GB
) and the version of MySQL (Server version: 10.0.12-MariaDB-1~trusty-wsrep-log mariadb.org binary distribution, wsrep_25.10.r4002
), there are still other pieces to this puzzle you have not revealed
- The InnoDB settings
- The Number of Cores
- Other settings from
my.cnf
If you can add these things to the question, I can further elaborate.
UPDATE 2014-08-28 11:27 EDT
You should increase threading
innodb_read_io_threads = 64
innodb_write_io_threads = 16
innodb_log_buffer_size = 256M
I would consider disabling the query cache (See my recent post Why query_cache_type is disabled by default start from MySQL 5.6?)
query_cache_size = 0
I would preserve the Buffer Pool
innodb_buffer_pool_dump_at_shutdown=1
innodb_buffer_pool_load_at_startup=1
Increase purge threads (if you do DML on multiple tables)
innodb_purge_threads = 4
GIVE IT A TRY !!!
Something is not right about your process.
Usually, when I see error 1236, such the following I used in my old post How can you monitor if MySQL binlog files get corrupted?
[ERROR] Error reading packet from server: Client requested master to start replication from impossible position ( server_errno=1236).
[ERROR] Slave I/O: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'Client requested master to start replication from impossible position', Error_code: 1236
111014 20:25:48 [Note] Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log 'mysql-bin.001067', position 183468345.
here was the situation: When doing MySQL Replication without GTID, the IO Thread examines the position from the latest Master binlog. If Read_Master_Log_Pos
is bigger than the actual filesize of the binlog, you get error 1236.
When doing MySQL Replication with GTID, the situation is somewhat similar. The IO Thread is looking for some kind of closure with regard to the GTID it was last using. When you restarted MySQL on the Master, you closed the last binlog on the Master and opened a new binlog upon startup. The IO Thread on the Slave was still active. Thus, the same error number is coming up.
The next time you restart a Master, remember the Slaves are active.
The slave should have reconnected after a minute, but that is not happening for you.
To play it safe, you should do the following
- On the Slave,
STOP SLAVE;
- On the Master,
service mysql restart
- On the Slave,
START SLAVE;
You should not have to do this. As an alternative, try setting up replication with heartbeat set at one tenth of a second:
CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD = 100;
This should make the IO Thread on the Slave a little more sensitive
Best Answer
This will alter the table with name table_name to set the column dt to nullable.