Unfortunately after searching SolarWinds' KB for about 10 minutes I cannot find what "Ineffective Statistics" measures. That information would be helpful. However, based on your question I'll infer that it means that the Statistics objects may be out of date or have taken quite a few modifications and Database Performance Analyzer has not detected an update of some sort. Without more information from the product vendor, it's hard to tell.
Having said that, there are a few things that you should know.
First, you can verify what's going on with your server right now (e.g. when you get the alert) and compare it against your monitoring tool. Here's a script that I use:
use [mydatabasename];
go
select
[schema_name] = sh.name,
[table_name] = t.name,
[stat_name] = s.name,
[column_names] = stuff((
select ','+index_col(t.name,sc.stats_id,sc.stats_column_id)
from sys.stats_columns sc
where sc.object_id = s.object_id
and sc.stats_id = s.stats_id
order by sc.stats_column_id
for xml path('')), 1, 1, ''
) ,
s.stats_id,
sp.last_updated,
sp.rows,
sp.rows_sampled,
sp.unfiltered_rows,
[sample_rate] = (100.*sp.rows_sampled)/sp.unfiltered_rows,
modification_counter,
[default_mod_threshold] = case when sp.unfiltered_rows < 500
then 500
else ( .20
* sp.unfiltered_rows
+ 500 )
end ,
[2371_mod_threshold] = sqrt(1000 * sp.unfiltered_rows),
[default_mod_hit] = case when sp.modification_counter > case
when sp.unfiltered_rows < 500
then 500
else ( .20
* sp.unfiltered_rows
+ 500 )
end then 1
else 0
end ,
[2371_mod_hit] = case when sp.modification_counter > sqrt(1000
* sp.unfiltered_rows)
then 1
end
from sys.stats s
join sys.tables t
on s.object_id = t.object_id
join sys.schemas sh
on t.schema_id = sh.schema_id
cross apply sys.dm_db_stats_properties(s.object_id,s.stats_id) sp
order by t.name, s.name;
Most of it is self-explanatory. However, I added the modification threshold for a statistics object at default and with TF 2371 included. The default threshold is an interesting calculation, while TF 2371 is the square root of 1000 * Table Cardinality. I included a calculation to include whether or not each of these thresholds had been hit yet. So run that inside the alerted database and see if what SolarWinds is seeing comports with what is occurring on the server right now. If it isn't then there's probably a timing issue in there somewhere such that the alert was generated before a stats update but after a massive amount of data change.
Having said that, it's important to know how AUTO_UPDATE of statistics actually works. There isn't a clock-like sweep that goes through and constantly updates statistics. Instead, the statistics are updated when the statistic object is loaded to compile a query plan. If the statistic is rarely/never used then it won't be updated unless you manually update it or if it happens to get caught up in an index rebuild as a dependent object for the index. However, if you have an index that's never getting used then that's a different situation altogether.
So in summary:
- Verify what the alert is telling you
- Know the factors that lead to a stats update
Best Answer
Fatal flaw in filtered indexes/statistics: churn is measured by % of row count for the table, not the index/statistic. Paraphrased from my blog post here:
You shouldn't rely on auto-update statistics for filtered objects. If the cardinality is important and the subset changes a lot more than the whole table, you will need to manage these manually.