Sql-server – Using COLLATE with UNION

collationsql servert-sqlunion

How to use COLLATE with UNION? I want to union 2 tables (both have the same columns and the same types: varchar,int, int, decimal).

I got the following error:

sg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS" and "Croatian_CI_AS" in the UNION operation.

My SQL statement:

select * from #IA_BIH
union 
select * from #IA_MNE

Where should I insert collate database_default? I tried different combinations, but it didn't work.

Best Answer

Based on the collation names I assume that you are using Microsoft SQL Server.

COLLATE can be used at the database level or the column level. Since you are trying to UNION two tables, using the column collation on the needed columns will resolve your query.

Here is a sample bit of code to help you:

use testdb
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.Serbian  (Name VARCHAR(20) COLLATE Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS);
CREATE TABLE dbo.Croatian (Name VARCHAR(20) COLLATE  Croatian_CI_AS);
GO
INSERT INTO dbo.Serbian VALUES ('serbian');
INSERT INTO dbo.Croatian VALUES ('croation');
GO

-- Collate to a particular named collation
SELECT Name COLLATE Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS as CollatedNameSerbian from dbo.Serbian 
UNION ALL
SELECT Name COLLATE Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS from dbo.Croatian 
GO
-- Collate to the database default collation
SELECT Name  COLLATE database_default as CollatedNameDBDefault from dbo.Serbian 
UNION ALL
SELECT Name COLLATE database_default from dbo.Croatian 
GO

DROP TABLE dbo.Serbian;
DROP TABLE dbo.Croatian;
GO

Of course, if you have several columns with conflicting collations you will need to define their collations as well.

Related Solutions

Sql-server – SQL Server: Collation of the resource database

The database Collation for the first SELECT statement in my query is Latin1_General_CI_AS.

Well, not exactly. There are a few problems with this statement:

The Database's default Collation only matters in a query when using string literals, variables, and return values from UDFs. AND, that default Collation only matters if there is no column or COLLATE keyword being used.
SELECT statements / queries, as a whole, do not use Collations. Collation is assigned per each string field, and it can be different for each field in a query.
The column in the first / top query, stopword, is not using the Latin1_General_CI_AS Collation (more on this in a moment).

I see that the system-stopwords are stored in the resource database, which can explain the difference in collation.

A column (or expression) coming from a different Database does not necessarily explain a difference in Collation. As stated above, Collation is set per each field of a query, whether that field comes from a column in a table or is an expression. Collation is usually derived naturally from Collation Precedence: Column Collation overrides literals and variables, and the COLLATE keyword overrides both. When there is a conflict, then you need the COLLATE keyword.

The main point here, however, is that if the stopword column in sys.fulltext_system_stopwords comes from a column in a Table in the Resource Database (i.e. mssqlsystemresource), OR if it comes from an expression in a View in the Resource Database that has its Collation set via the COLLATE keyword, then the default Collation of the Resource Database is irrelevant.

I can 'solve' my error by using COLLATE in my query

Yes, the COLLATE keyword is the way to go. However, to fix this conflict, you only need to specify the COLLATE keyword in one query, though it does not matter which query.

For example, if I run the query with no COLLATE keyword, I get:

SELECT ftsw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_stopwords ftsw

UNION

SELECT ftssw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_system_stopwords ftssw;

Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 4
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the UNION operation.

So, assuming that the conflict is in the second (i.e. bottom) SELECT statement, I could fix it by applying the current DB's default Collation:

SELECT ftsw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_stopwords ftsw
UNION
SELECT ftssw.stopword COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
FROM sys.fulltext_system_stopwords ftssw;

And that works. BUT, what if we try putting COLLATE on the first / top SELECT:

SELECT ftsw.stopword COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
FROM sys.fulltext_stopwords ftsw
UNION
SELECT ftssw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_system_stopwords ftssw;

That also works. And in fact, both of the following also work:

SELECT ftsw.stopword COLLATE Hebrew_100_CI_AS
FROM sys.fulltext_stopwords ftsw
UNION
SELECT ftssw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_system_stopwords ftssw;

-- and:

SELECT ftsw.stopword
FROM sys.fulltext_stopwords ftsw
UNION
SELECT ftssw.stopword COLLATE Hebrew_100_CI_AS
FROM sys.fulltext_system_stopwords ftssw;

Also, rather than use the DATABASE_DEFAULT option, which here equates to Latin1_General_CI_AS, I would use Latin1_General_BIN (or better yet: Latin1_General_100_BIN2, which is newer and better) in this particular case because it will ensure that different strings that can be normalized into the same string via the "distinct" behavior of the UNION (without the ALL) and the case-insensitivity of the Latin1_General_CI_AS Collation show up as different rows.

Where does the Latin1_General_BIN collation come from? It looks like the sys.fulltext_system_stopwords table has a different collation, but why?

That Collation comes from an unlikely source. Let's look at the system catalog views in the query:

EXEC sys.sp_help N'sys.fulltext_stopwords';

The results indicate that this is a View (as expected) and that the stopword column has a Collation of Latin1_General_BIN (not expected). But wait, if the Latin1_General_BIN Collation is coming from sys.fulltext_stopwords, then what about sys.fulltext_system_stopwords and where is the other Collation coming from? Let's look:

EXEC sys.sp_help N'sys.fulltext_system_stopwords';

The results indicate that this is a View (as expected) and that the stopword column has a Collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS (not expected).

We can now dig a little deeper into the definition of each of those system catalog views:

EXEC sys.sp_helptext N'sys.fulltext_stopwords';

Returns (simplified):

SELECT 
    fts.stopword,
FROM sys.sysftstops fts

And then:

EXEC sys.sp_help N'sys.sysftstops';

The results indicate that this is a system table, and that the stopword column indeed has a Collation of Latin1_General_BIN.

Next we can move on to the other system catalog view:

EXEC sys.sp_helptext N'sys.fulltext_system_stopwords';

Returns (simplified):

SELECT convert(nvarchar(64), stopword) as stopword, language_id
FROM OpenRowset(TABLE FTSYSSTPWD)

And FTSYSSTPWD comes from the Resource Database, so there isn't much more we can do at this point.

Still, there is one last thing we can do to be clear about the Collation of the data coming from the Resource Database -- sys.fulltext_system_stopwords.stopword:

CREATE DATABASE [FullTextCollationTest] COLLATE SQL_EBCDIC277_CP1_CS_AS;
GO
USE [FullTextCollationTest];

EXEC sys.sp_help N'sys.fulltext_stopwords';
-- Collation for [stopword] column: Latin1_General_BIN      (same as before)

EXEC sys.sp_help N'sys.fulltext_system_stopwords';
-- Collation for [stopword] column: SQL_EBCDIC277_CP1_CS_AS (same as DB's default Collation)

GO
USE [master];
DROP DATABASE [FullTextCollationTest];

SQL Server 2008R2 – Convert Collation

Assuming those objects are stored procedures or views (and not tables), you'll need to:

script the objects in question
drop them from the database (or just remove the schema-binding)
change the database collation
recreate the objects by running the scripts you created in the first step.

As an aside, you didn't need to sp_msforeachtable "ALTER TABLE..."

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Sql-server – SQL Server: Collation of the resource database

SQL Server 2008R2 – Convert Collation

Related Question