Sql-server – the best index strategy or query SELECT when performing a search/lookup BETWEEN IP address (IPv4 and IPv6) ranges

configurationindex-tuningperformancequery-performancesql server

Question: Is there a better indexing strategy or query SELECT that I can use for looking up one large data set against another large data set? Or, should I look at placing the lookup dimension table in memory (all 125 GB of it)?

Server Configuration:

The server is a virtual server running on top of VMWare, so additional hardware can be added in the background without having to reinstall the operating system
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 (RTM) – 14.0.1000.169 (X64)
Aug 22 2017 17:04:49
Copyright (C) 2017 Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows Server 2016 Standard 10.0 (Build 14393: ) (Hypervisor)
Note: I was previously on 2014 Enterprise – I have inquired why I was placed on Standard.
There is only one instance that is running 2 databases: mine and the DBAs
2 File groups, with 1 file each: PRIMARY (system tables : not-default) and SECONDARY (non-system tables : default). The SECONDARY was meant to be scalable to hold more files once more CPUs were added. When the file group was initially created the server only had 2 CPUs
8 GB memory
500 GB disk storage (ISCSI SAN)
4 CPUs (Intel I assume)

IIS Exchange Server log table Schema:

CREATE TABLE [FWY].[ExchangeServerLogTest](
    [RowKey] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    [SourceFileName] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
    [SourceServer] [varchar](9) NOT NULL,
    [SourceService] [varchar](6) NOT NULL,
    [EventOccuranceTs] [datetime] NOT NULL,
    [ServiceType] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
    [UserNameType] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
    [DomainId] [varchar](50) NULL,
    [DomainName] [varchar](255) NULL,
    [UserNameToLookup] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [UserAgent] [varchar](255) NULL,
    [OutsideProtocolId] [varchar](10) NOT NULL,
    [OutsideIp] [varchar](39) NULL,
    [OutsideIpHex] [varbinary](16) NULL,
    [InsideProtocolId] [varchar](10) NOT NULL,
    [InsideIp] [varchar](39) NULL,
    [InsideIpHex] [varbinary](16) NULL,
    [DeviceId] [varchar](32) NULL,
    [DeviceType] [varchar](25) NULL,
    [DeviceModel] [varchar](75) NULL,
    [AsOfDt] [date] NULL,
    [OutsideProtocolKey] [int] NULL,
    [InsideProtocolKey] [int] NULL,
 CONSTRAINT [PK_ExchangeServerLogTest] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED 
(
    [RowKey] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [SECONDARY]
) ON [SECONDARY]

Non-Clustered Index:

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [NCIDX_ExchangeServerLogTest_InsideOutsideProtocolKeyIpHexInclRowKey] ON [FWY].[ExchangeServerLogTest]
(
    [InsideProtocolKey] ASC,
    [OutsideProtocolKey] ASC,
    [InsideIpHex] ASC,
    [OutsideIpHex] ASC
)
INCLUDE (   [RowKey]) WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)
GO

IP GeoLocation data vendor table schema

CREATE TABLE [DE].[IpGeoLocation](
    [CreateTs] [datetime] NOT NULL,
    [CreateBy] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
    [CreateSequenceKey] [int] NULL,
    [UpdateTs] [datetime] NULL,
    [UpdateBy] [varchar](50) NULL,
    [UpdateSequenceKey] [int] NULL,
    [ActiveInd] [int] NOT NULL,
    [RowKey] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    [VendorKey] [int] NULL,
    [VendorTypeKey] [int] NULL,
    [DimensionTypeKey] [int] NULL,
    [ProtocolKey] [int] NULL,
    [ProtocolId] [varchar](10) NOT NULL,
    [EffectiveStartDate] [date] NULL,
    [EffectiveEndDate] [date] NULL,
    [NetworkStartIp] [varchar](39) NOT NULL,
    [NetworkStartIpHex] [varbinary](16) NULL,
    [NetworkEndIp] [varchar](39) NOT NULL,
    [NetworkEndIpHex] [varbinary](16) NULL,
    [Country] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [Region] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [City] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [ConnectionSpeed] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [ConnectionType] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [MetroCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [Latitude] [numeric](6, 3) NULL,
    [Longitude] [numeric](6, 3) NULL,
    [PostalCode] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [PostalExtension] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [CountryCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [RegionCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [CityCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [ContinentCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [TwoLetterCountry] [varchar](2) NOT NULL,
    [InternalCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [AreaCodes] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [CountryConfidenceCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [RegionConfidenceCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [CityConfidenceCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [PostalConfidenceCode] [int] NOT NULL,
    [GmtOffset] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [InDistance] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
    [TimeZoneName] [varchar](255) NOT NULL,
 CONSTRAINT [PK_IpGeoLocation] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED 
(
    [RowKey] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [SECONDARY]
) ON [SECONDARY]

Non-Clustered Index:

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [NCIDX_IpGeoLocation_ProtocolKeyNetworkStartEndIpHexIncRowKey] ON [DE].[IpGeoLocation]
(
    [ProtocolKey] ASC,
    [NetworkStartIpHex] ASC,
    [NetworkEndIpHex] ASC
)
INCLUDE (   [RowKey]) WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)
GO

IP addresses are converted to their hexadecimal value using .NET's System.Net class: Ipaddress.Parse(IpAddress).GetAddressBytes(). I load the data files with SSIS and I have a script component that returns the ProtocolId and the IP address as a Byte array, which goes into SSIS as DT_BYTE and is mapped to a SQL Server VARBINARY(16) field (the byte array is implicitly converted to a hexadecimal value).

Lookup IP Address range

I have two data sets: IIS Exchange Server IP log records and IP GeoLocation data provided by a 3rd party vendor; where the Geolocation covers a range of IP addresses. I need to lookup the IP address from the log file and get its GeoLocation. Both data sets accommodate for IPv4 and IPv6 and the IP address is received in string format. When I load the data, I convert the IP address into a hexadecimal value [VARBINARY(16)] so that I can lookup an IP addresses GeoLocation.

The problem here is that I am loading a large amount of records. Currently, the vendor provides close to 200 million IP address Geolocations (i.e., dimension lookup table). I knew from the inception that performance optimization will be required at all stages (i.e., hardware configuration, table partitioning, and indexing strategy). I have loaded one week's worth of sample log data and that is approximately 150 million records.

Note: The log files are parsed where approximately 90% of records are ignored – we are only loading 10% of the records, so there is no performance boost that can be made here

I have created the following indexes on the ExchangeLogs table:

A clustered index on an integer IDENTITY column called RowId
A non-clustered index on the ProtocolId (i.e., IPv4 or IPv6 represented as integers), IpHex; where the RowId is included

I have created the following indexes on the IPGeoLocation table:

A clustered index on an integer IDENTITY column called RowId
A non-clustered index on the ProtocolId (i.e., IPv4 or IPv6 represented as integers), StartIpHex, and EndIpHex; where the RowId is included

When searching for the IP Geolocation, I join the two datasets as follows:

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DE.RowKey)
FROM DE.IpGeoLocation DE
INNER JOIN FWY.ExchangeServerLogTest T
    ON T.InsideProtocolKey = DE.ProtocolKey
    AND T.InsideIpHex BETWEEN DE.NetworkStartIpHex AND DE.NetworkEndIpHex

Estimated Query Execution Plan: Estimated InsideIp Query Execution Plan

Actual Query Execution Plan: Waiting for query to complete

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DE.RowKey)
FROM DE.IpGeoLocation DE
INNER JOIN FWY.ExchangeServerLogTest T
    ON T.OutsideProtocolKey = DE.ProtocolKey
    AND T.OutsideIpHex BETWEEN DE.NetworkStartIpHex AND DE.NetworkEndIpHex

Estimated Execution Plan: Estimated OutsideIp Query Execution Plan

Actual Query Execution Plan: DOES NOT FINISH

Note 2: The ProtocolId must be included, otherwise there are two results for each IP lookup: one for IPv4 and one for IPv6.

This seems like a very efficient execution plan considering 95% of the cost is on an index seek and another 2% on an index scan – 97% is attributed to index work.

The log files contain both internal and external IP Address on each row. For the sample data loaded:

The Internal IP list contains 3 DISTINCT IP addresses.
The external IP list contains approximately 60,000 DISTINCT IP Address.

Results:

A SELECT on the internal IP list takes about 9 minutes to complete.
A SELECT on the external IP list was stopped after allowing it to run for 16.25 hours (overnight).

I have not partitioned either the log table or the IP GeoLocation table. This might provide a performance boost by streaming data through two separate LUNs, but I am still trying to get a hardware configuration specification from our IT Ops group (they just provisioned new servers, so I don't have that info yet).

Best Answer

First, I suggest you add two separate indexes, on
```
(InsideProtocolKey, InsideIpHex) INCLUDE (RowKey)

(OutsideProtocolKey, OutsideIpHex) INCLUDE (RowKey)
```
and try the queries again. Your 4-column index is not good for the "Outside" query as the columns appear in the 2nd and 4th position and only slightly good for the "inside" query (1st and 3rd). Plus, these 2 indexes will be half in size (20 bytes vs 40 bytes per row).
Second, a minor improvement. Since you only have two options for the ProtocolKey column (and its variations, Inside/Outside), you could conevert (all of them) from int (4 bytes) to tinyint (1 byte) or even to bit (1 bit) and save 3 bytes per row (or 3 + 7/8).

It won't be a huge saving, but for big tables, it would help. For the not so big, 200M rows x 3 bytes = 600MB save, for every index where the columns appear. I'm not entirely sure about space use of indexes bit columns but surely the save would be either the same as with tinyint (600MB) or more (up to 775MB) for the same table size. Still, and I mention this again, for every index that uses the column.

Smaller indexes, smaller size on disk and more important, less memory and more probable to stay in memory, especially with the low RAM server you have.
Third, 8GB sounds like a very small amount of RAM these days, especially when you have tables of this size. RAM is cheap (at least until you pass the 128GB Standard/Enterprise threshold and then you have the bigger licence charge).

Related Solutions

Sql-server – Parent-Child Tree Hierarchical ORDER

OK, enough brain cells are dead.

SQL Fiddle

WITH cte AS
(
  SELECT 
    [ICFilterID], 
    [ParentID],
    [FilterDesc],
    [Active],
    CAST(0 AS varbinary(max)) AS Level
  FROM [dbo].[ICFilters]
  WHERE [ParentID] = 0
  UNION ALL
  SELECT 
    i.[ICFilterID], 
    i.[ParentID],
    i.[FilterDesc],
    i.[Active],  
    Level + CAST(i.[ICFilterID] AS varbinary(max)) AS Level
  FROM [dbo].[ICFilters] i
  INNER JOIN cte c
    ON c.[ICFilterID] = i.[ParentID]
)

SELECT 
  [ICFilterID], 
  [ParentID],
  [FilterDesc],
  [Active]
FROM cte
ORDER BY [Level];

Sql-server – deteriorating stored procedure running times

What is up with FROM part JOIN model ON 1=1? This the same as FROM part, model, which is a cartesian join and will result in a very large number of rows. Is that join supposed to be like that?

You will likely help us help you if you provide details about the tables involved. Please "script" the definition of the tables, along with any indexes defined on those tables.

This sounds like a classic case of parameter sniffing resulting in good plan/bad plan choices for various scenarios in your data.

You may be able to get more reliable performance by making SQL Server cache different plans for different scenarios by using sp_executesql, as in the following example:

CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[create_grid_materials2] 
(
    @partlistid bigint
    , @pid bigint
    , @masterid bigint
)
AS
BEGIN
    begin
        DECLARE @cmd NVARCHAR(MAX);

        SET @cmd = '   
        INSERT INTO material (partid, personid, modelID)
        SELECT 
            partid = part.id
            , personid = @pid
            , modelid = model.id  
        FROM part
            INNER JOIN model ON 1=1
        WHERE (
            model.masterid = ' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(50), @masterid) + ' 
                AND model.modelSetID IS NULL
                AND part.partlistid = ' + CONVERT(NVARCHAR(50), @partlistid) + '
                AND (
                    part.partType = 100 
                    or part.partType=120 
                    or part.partType = 130
                )
            )
            AND NOT EXISTS (
                SELECT 1 
                FROM material AS a1 
                WHERE a1.partid = part.id 
                    AND a1.personid=@pid 
                    AND a1.modelid=model.id
                )';
        DECLARE @Params VARCHAR(200);
        SET @Params = '@pid INT';
        EXEC sys.sp_executesql @cmd
            , @Params
            , @pid = @pid;
    end
End

The above code will cause a new plan to be generated for each combination of @partlistid, and @masterid.

The presumption here is some combinations of those two variables lead to a very small number of rows, whereas some combinations lead to a very large number of rows.

Forcing a plan for each combination allows SQL Server to generate more efficient plans for each. I've explicitly not included @pid since you probably want to try it with a fairly small number of combinations first; adding a third variable to the mix will make for an exponentially larger number of possible plans.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Sql-server – Parent-Child Tree Hierarchical ORDER

Sql-server – deteriorating stored procedure running times

Related Question