Sql-server – SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Availability Group active/passive

If the secondary is up and running, when the log block is flushed to disk (either because it is full or a commit), the record gets pushed to the log writer on the primary and to the log scanner (log reader) process on the primary simultaneously. Then the log scanner communicates with the secondary and the secondary then pulls the transaction from the log scanner on the primary to the secondary and processes the log record. The primary log writer doesn't push transactions across, it just communicates with the secondary, it only does that to see if it is up so that it knows it doesn't have to mark the replica as NOT SYNCRONIZED.

When the secondary is not up, then the log writer cant communicate with the secondary so it marks it as NOT SYNCHRONIZED and stores the records in the tran log on the primary. If you look at sys.databases.log_reuse_wait_desc column it should show AVAILABILITY_REPLICA which means the primary is hanging on to all the records.

Once the secondary is up, it will communicate with the primary to request a log scan, it then processes the transactions and communicates with the primary using progress messages to indicate the hardened LSN, presumably the primary is then adjusting its MinLSN, which in turn means the records prior to MinLSN will get deleted as checkpoints happen and hence VLFs will get truncated releasing space when you do a log backup.

But yes short answer is, if your secondary is down you need as big a log file as you need for as long as it is down. Once it is backup and synched at some time you may need to remove the db from the always on group to shrink the log if it is humungous and you dont want it that big.

Microsoft describes it's support for Availability Groups with SSRS in BOL. In particular is the section titled "Report Server Databases and Availability Groups." In my experience, having ReportServer and ReportServerTempDb be part of an AG works fine in most cases, but there is some peculiar behavior with subscriptions and failover--which is described in the BOL article.

Having independent ReportServerTempDb databases on each server, but not participating in the AG is not something I would try--but it would likely be problematic in it's own ways. It would also not be a supported configuration.

You should look at this answer to see why your transaction log is growing. I suspect it is due to an open transaction in the ReportServerTempDb. On a number of occasions, I have seen the CleanBatch process get hung, and create a scenario where it has an open transaction but is performing no work. The net result is that your transaction log gets huge. If you see the same behavior, then simply kill the spid with the open transaction, and things should return to normal.