If the sequence is:
- DBCC CHECKDB reported errors.
- REPAIR_REBUILD fixed the database, no errors reported.
- DBCC CHECKDB reporting errors again.
You probably have failed or failing disks in an array or some other component of the IO subsystem is broken, or breaking. Personally, I'd want off the problem server ASAP!
- Take a tail-log backup.
- Restore last known good full backup and diff/log sequence to a different server.
- Switch service to the second server.
- Get a fresh cuppa and start diagnosis on the problem server.
Addendum: Root cause of the problem:
as it turned out, I found that as we are using Diskeeper, we are (for corporate reasons) still using an old version : 14.0.896. With this version we run into messages like :
The operating system returned error 1784(failed to retrieve text for this error. Reason: 15100) to SQL Server during a write at offset 0x000000010a4000 in file 'D:\Application-Data\MSSQL\Data\<Database>.mdf:MSSQL_DBCC17'. Additional messages in the SQL Server error log and system event log may provide more detail. This is a severe system-level error condition that threatens database integrity and must be corrected immediately. Complete a full database consistency check (DBCC CHECKDB). This error can be caused by many factors; for more information, see SQL Server Books Online.
Msg 3313, Level 21, State 2, Server <Server>, Line 1
During redoing of a logged operation in database '<Database>', an error occurred at log record ID (2349664:1503:4). Typically, the specific failure is previously logged as an error in the Windows Event Log service. Restore the database from a full backup, or repair the database.
Msg 1823, Level 16, State 1, Server <Server>, Line 1
A database snapshot cannot be created because it failed to start.
Msg 1823, Level 16, State 2, Server <Server>, Line 1
A database snapshot cannot be created because it failed to start.
Msg 7928, Level 16, State 1, Server <Server>, Line 1
The database snapshot for online checks could not be created. Either the reason is given in a previous error or one of the underlying volumes does not support sparse files or alternate streams. Attempting to get exclusive access to run checks offline.
Msg 5030, Level 16, State 12, Server <Server>, Line 1
The database could not be exclusively locked to perform the operation.
Msg 7926, Level 16, State 1, Server <Server>, Line 1
Check statement aborted. The database could not be checked as a database snapshot could not be created and the database or table could not be locked. See Books Online for details of when this behavior is expected and what workarounds exist. Also see previous errors for more details
Found an explanation on Paul Randal's blog here
Link to DiskKeeper Fix found here
Interesting Diskeeper white paper on database defragmentation here
Best Answer
The code behind CHECKTABLE is indeed likely the vast amount of time spent by CHECDB, as mentioned by @Mo64. I.e., the "sum of CHECKTABLE" should roughly be the same as a CHECKDB, one can imagine.
However, by default CHECKTABLE uses a database snapshot. Not a "table snapshot", since there is no such concept. I.e., you can check one table and if modification occurs on some other table at the same time, the original for that data need to be saved in the snapshot file first. Here is one aspect where the "sum of CHECKTABLE" can exceed one CHECKDB.
Anyhow, your question is about overhead. Yes, pretty much the same (or rather, it won't be (much) less for CHECKTABLE. You have the database snapshot and copy-on-write for the whole database (although the snapshot would live for a shorted time when you check only one table). And SQL server should need space in tempdb as well.
Above is from theoretical reasoning, I should add.