Seeing that the recovery model is set to simple and msdn states that the simple recovery model does not support point-in-time recovery - Does this mean that I won't be able to use my transaction log backups to restore the database in a disaster to an hour before it happened?
Even taking a transaction log backup is not supported for databases using the SIMPLE
recovery model. This is a restriction of the database engine based on how this recovery model works, and the recovery features it doesn't support, as you mentioned.
A transaction log backup maintenance plan task automatically skips databases in SIMPLE
recovery to avoid causing errors.
Which backup should be done first, the database backup or the transaction log backups? Articles that I'm busy reading say I should do the database backup first and then the transaction log backup else I will get maintenance plan errors, but I'm currently first backing up my transaction logs and then data databases and I'm not getting any errors.
For the reasons I mentioned above, it won't matter for databases using SIMPLE
recovery, as they will be skipped by the transaction log backup task.
For databases in the other two recovery models, a full backup must exist before you start taking transaction log backups (just the first time), or you will get an error -- this is probably what the articles refer to.
Point-in-time recovery ability is normally driven by business need -- in other words, you determine how critical the data is and how much you can afford to lose, then set the appropriate recovery model to meet those needs, and finally create a backup solution.
Even though SIMPLE
recovery does not support point-in-time recovery, if an hour of data loss is okay, perhaps a differential backup solution could work for you. (There are far too many variables that go into developing this kind of solution to give you a complete picture with what was provided in the question.)
Best Answer
Why do we separate things onto different disks?
Performance and resilience.
From the Disaster Recovery perspective, if you lose any one of your disks, how much damage does it do?
Lose the operating system disk? OK, that's a biggy. :-(
Lose the backup disk? Non-event; you still have a running database instance.
Lose the data disk? Ouch! But that's OK; you've got your backups ... You just need to restore them into a running SQLServer instance ...
Ah.
But you had that on the same [data] disk that just failed, taking the data with it!
Keep the installation and data separate.
Whilst it's only semantics, I'd suggest keeping a closer "association" between the Data and Logs disks; they make up all the stuff you really care about.
Move the backups off to another server altogether. (Whilst it's unlikely these days) If all these disks are local to the machine and the machine's motherboard were to fail, it wouldn't matter how many disks you had; they'd all be gone!