Eventually found the answer when attempting to work around the problem using SSIS and the VFP ODBC driver. VFPODBC provided a more verbose error message, stating that the .fpt file was missing for the dbf file I was attempting to query.
The staff that did the original data copy (the VFP data is hosted off server) failed to include all the data available (.cdxs, .fpts, .etc). After recopying the data, the linked server described above functions correctly.
Your problem begins and ends with statistics and estimates. I have reproduced your situation on my servers and found some interesting hints, and a workaround solution.
First things first, let's take a look at your execution plan:
When a view is used we can see that a filter is applied after the Remote Query is executed, while without the view there was no filter applied at all. The truth is that the filter was applied inside the Remote Query, at the remote server, before retrieving the data over the network.
Well, obviously applying the filter at the remote server and thus retrieving less data is a better option, and obviously that only happens when not using a view.
So... what is so intersting...?
Surprisingly, when I changed the filter from cognome = 'test'
to cognome = N'test'
(unicode representation of the string) the view used the same execution plan as the first query did.
I guess the reason is that somehow when using the view SQL Server estimated that there will be a small number of rows returning from the (remote) query, and that a local filtering will be cheaper, but when SQL Server had to implicit convert NVARCHAR
to VARCHAR
, statistics could no longer be used and the decision to filter locally was not taken.
I have looked for the statistics locally, but the view had no statistics, so my guess is that the view uses the remote statistics in a way that ad-hoc query does not, and than takes the wrong decision.
OK, so what solves the problem?
I stated earlier that there is a workaround (at least until someone comes up with a better solution), and no, I don't mean using unicode for your strings.
I wanted to give an answer first, I still have to find why, but when using an Inline Function
SQL Server behaves exactly the same as with the query (without view), so replacing the view with the function will give the same result, in a simple query, and with good peformance (at least in my environment).
My code suggestion for you is:
CREATE FUNCTION fn_anagrafiche2()
RETURNS table
AS
RETURN
(
SELECT *
FROM dolph2.agendasdn.dbo.vistaanagraficagrp
UNION
SELECT *
FROM dolph2.acampanet.dbo.vistaanagraficagrp
UNION
SELECT *
FROM municipio2.dbnet.dbo.vistaanagraficagrp
)
GO
The query will then be:
SELECT *
FROM fn_anagrafiche2()
WHERE cognome = 'prova'
This works on my servers, but of course test it first.
Note: I do not recommend using SELECT *
at all, as it is prone to future errors, I simply used it because it was in your question and there was no need for me to change that when I can add this remark instead :)
Best Answer
In my experience, DML statements over Linked Servers is sllooowww (I believe that is the proper, technical spelling of this particular type of slowness ;-).
I found that the following setup was mucho faster:
Create a stored procedure on the remote server:
RemoteTable_DeleteByEntryIDList
NVARCHAR(MAX)
parameter called@EntryIDs
EntryID
s in XMLThe proc will do something along the lines of:
Update your local stored proc to do something like: