You don't need 30 join conditions for a FULL OUTER JOIN
here.
You can just Full Outer Join on the PK, preserve rows with at least one difference with WHERE EXISTS (SELECT A.* EXCEPT SELECT B.*)
and use CROSS APPLY (SELECT A.* UNION ALL SELECT B.*)
to unpivot out both sides of the JOIN
ed rows into individual rows.
WITH TableA(Col1, Col2, Col3)
AS (SELECT 'Dog',1,1 UNION ALL
SELECT 'Cat',27,86 UNION ALL
SELECT 'Cat',128,92),
TableB(Col1, Col2, Col3)
AS (SELECT 'Dog',1,1 UNION ALL
SELECT 'Cat',27,105 UNION ALL
SELECT 'Lizard',83,NULL)
SELECT CA.*
FROM TableA A
FULL OUTER JOIN TableB B
ON A.Col1 = B.Col1
AND A.Col2 = B.Col2
/*Unpivot the joined rows*/
CROSS APPLY (SELECT 'TableA' AS what, A.* UNION ALL
SELECT 'TableB' AS what, B.*) AS CA
/*Exclude identical rows*/
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT A.*
EXCEPT
SELECT B.*)
/*Discard NULL extended row*/
AND CA.Col1 IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY CA.Col1, CA.Col2
Gives
what Col1 Col2 Col3
------ ------ ----------- -----------
TableA Cat 27 86
TableB Cat 27 105
TableA Cat 128 92
TableB Lizard 83 NULL
Or a version dealing with the moved goalposts.
SELECT DISTINCT CA.*
FROM TableA A
FULL OUTER JOIN TableB B
ON EXISTS (SELECT A.* INTERSECT SELECT B.*)
CROSS APPLY (SELECT 'TableA' AS what, A.* UNION ALL
SELECT 'TableB' AS what, B.*) AS CA
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT A.* INTERSECT SELECT B.*)
AND CA.Col1 IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY CA.Col1, CA.Col2
For tables with many columns it can still be difficult to identify the specific column(s) that differ. For that you can potentially use the below.
(though just on relatively small tables as otherwise this method likely won't have adequate performance)
SELECT t1.primary_key,
y1.c,
y1.v,
y2.v
FROM t1
JOIN t2
ON t1.primary_key = t2.primary_key
CROSS APPLY (SELECT t1.*
FOR xml path('row'), elements xsinil, type) x1(x)
CROSS APPLY (SELECT t2.*
FOR xml path('row'), elements xsinil, type) x2(x)
CROSS APPLY (SELECT n.n.value('local-name(.)', 'sysname'),
n.n.value('.', 'nvarchar(max)')
FROM x1.x.nodes('row/*') AS n(n)) y1(c, v)
CROSS APPLY (SELECT n.n.value('local-name(.)', 'sysname'),
n.n.value('.', 'nvarchar(max)')
FROM x2.x.nodes('row/*') AS n(n)) y2(c, v)
WHERE y1.c = y2.c
AND EXISTS(SELECT y1.v
EXCEPT
SELECT y2.v)
The transaction log does not not contain statements, it contains the physical changes occurred in the database. If you see a log record that indicate a delete you cannot know if this was a DELETE statement, a MERGE statement or a wide (split) UPDATE statement. If you see an operation indicating an INSERT you cannot know if it was an INSERT (...) VALUES (...) or it was an INSERT (...) SELECT (...) or it was an INSERT (...) EXEC or it was a MERGE or it was a wide (split) UPDATE. And so on and so forth. Specifically, the transaction log does not intend to substitute for an audit trace.
The transcriptional replication agent has means to reconstruct T-SQL operation with identical effect as those that changed a published article, but how it does it is not public information.
If you want to monitor data changes, use Change Tracking or Change Data Capture. If you want to monitor T-SQL activity, use profiler traces.
Best Answer
The CTE part calculates DATEDIFF with the previous row, every time it finds an 'Approved' AppStatus after an 'In review'AppStatus.
The simply sums the calculated days and divide by the rows that has calculated days.
db<>fiddle here
UPDATE
Due you are on 2008 and as per comments you pointed out there is an IDENTITY column, you can simulate LAG/LEAD function using an APPLY join with the next ID.
db<>fiddle here