Do I need to remove the possible owner node in cluster while applying SQL Service Pack 3 in SQL 2012 in Windows 2012 R2 . MS article says its recommended to do avoid corruption. Is it mandatory to do it in Win 2012 R2 ?
Sql-server – Applying Service Pack 3 in SQL 2012 in Windows 2012 R2
sql serversql-server-2012
Related Question
- SQL Server – Service Pack Update Notifications
- Sql-server – SQL Server 2008 R2 service pack steps …on cluster
- Sql-server – Apply SQLServer Service Pack to a Single Node Cluster
- SQL Server 2012 – Upgrade Windows 2008 R2 Cluster to 2012 R2
- Sql-server – How to determine the service pack of Sql Server
- SQL Server 2012 – Support on Windows Server 2008 R2
- Sql-server – SQL Server Standard Edition Failover Cluster Installing Windows Updates
- SQL Server 2012 Express – Is It Possible to Install a Service Pack?
Best Answer
I suppose you are referring to This support article. The purpose of this support article is if you are trying to install Service pack on cluster without disturbing the current cluster configuration(active nodes) and you want to keep things online.
I suggest take application downtime and apply service pack in that case you don't have to remove any possible owners from the list. I always consider this better way of applying SP, although MS provides you way to update the passive node of cluster without disturbing active node.
This article also helps you when you add node to cluster with RTM version while cluster is on higher SP level, then you have to apply SP on passive node in that case after adding node make sure the added node is not in possible owner list and go ahead and apply patch on passive nodes added so as to make it identical to all nodes.