Postgresql – Postgres COPY command gets Error: out of memory

\copy can use a temporary table.

First I tested and confirmed this with version 9.0 at the command line.
Then I created a file with SQL and psql meta command \copy using multiple temporary tables. That worked for me, too.

CREATE TEMP TABLE tmp as SELECT * FROM tbl;
\copy (SELECT * FROM tmp JOIN tbl USING (id)) TO '/var/lib/postgres/test1.csv';

Call:

psql -p5432 mydb -f test.sql

Note the terminating semicolon, which is optional at the end of a file (terminated implicitly), but required after any other SQL statement and also after the last one if executed in psql interactively.

Normally, psql meta-commands cannot be mixed with SQL on the same line in a file executed per psql -f. I quote the manual on psql:

Parsing for arguments stops at the end of the line, or when another unquoted backslash is found. An unquoted backslash is taken as the beginning of a new meta-command. The special sequence \\ (two backslashes) marks the end of arguments and continues parsing SQL commands, if any. That way SQL and psql commands can be freely mixed on a line. But in any case, the arguments of a meta-command cannot continue beyond the end of the line.

Different rules apply after \copy, though. Essentially, psql switches back to SQL mode automatically after \copy See:

• How to update selected rows with values from a CSV file in Postgres?

But you wrote you had all commands on separate lines. So that cannot be the explanation in your case.

All that aside, have you considered using COPY (the SQL command) instead of \copy (the psql meta-command)?

Of course, the target file would have to be local to the server not the client in this case. And different file privileges apply. The manual:

Files named in a COPY command are read or written directly by the server, not by the client application. Therefore, they must reside on or be accessible to the database server machine, not the client. They must be accessible to and readable or writable by the PostgreSQL user (the user ID the server runs as), not the client.

First, let's assume that work_mem is at 1024MB, and not the impossible 1024GB reported (impossible with a total of 3GB on the machine).

Anyway it's much too high. As said in Resource Consumption in PostgreSQL documentation, with some emphasis added:

work_mem (integer)

Specifies the amount of memory to be used by internal sort operations and hash tables before writing to temporary disk files. The value defaults to one megabyte (1MB). Note that for a complex query, several sort or hash operations might be running in parallel; each operation will be allowed to use as much memory as this value specifies before it starts to write data into temporary files. Also, several running sessions could be doing such operations concurrently. Therefore, the total memory used could be many times the value of work_mem; it is necessary to keep this fact in mind when choosing the value. Sort operations are used for ORDER BY, DISTINCT, and merge joins. Hash tables are used in hash joins, hash-based aggregation, and hash-based processing of IN subqueries.

The query whose plan is shown is complex and requires several levels of hashing, so you're clearly in the case the doc is warning against.

The default 1Mb is conservative, but I wouldn't raise work_mem above 128MB for a 3GB instance. shared_buffers on the other hand could be set to 1024MB: this one is allocated only once and kept for the entire instance's lifetime.