You did not specify PostgreSQL version. On 9.0.5 I have observed the same behavior (not sure if it's a bug, see comments below).
This is easy to workaround - you can first test for definedness to catch NULL, and if it passed, test for empty string.
if ( not defined $_TD->{ new }{ $column } ) {
elog( NOTICE, "New value in column $column is not defined" );
}
elsif ( $_TD->{ new }{ $column } eq '' ) {
elog( NOTICE, "New value in column $column is empty" );
}
if ( not defined $_TD->{ old }{ $column } ) {
elog( NOTICE, "Old value in column $column is not defined" );
}
elsif ( $_TD->{ old }{ $column } eq '' ) {
elog( NOTICE, "Old value in column $column is empty" );
}
Aha! I've found the answer. Talk about an edge case.
First, I found this post from 2007, where someone says:
...the AFTER trigger for synchronizing the CTXCAT index on [column] is
not firing (since my update statement does not include the indexed
column).
...
Oracle, would it not be better to generate the CTXCAT
trigger to examine the :old and :new values in the indexed column,
rather than using a check on (if updating([column]))?
Over a year later, someone replied:
I fixed this issue by adding additional UPDATING (first_name and
last_name) conditions in the DR$table_name trigger.
Here is part of the modified trigger.
if (inserting or updating('LAST_NAME_FIRST') or updating('FIRST_NAME')
or updating('LAST_NAME')) then reindex := TRUE;
Hm, so the CTXCAT index uses a trigger to know when it needs to update the index for a particular entry. All I need to do is tweak the trigger and recompile it so it does what I want.
To get the content of the trigger:
SELECT text
FROM user_source
WHERE name = 'DR$NAMES_IDXTC'
AND type = 'TRIGGER'
ORDER BY line;
I copied this into Sublime, prettified it, and found this (simplified):
TRIGGER "TEST"."DR$NAMES_IDXTC" AFTER
INSERT
OR
UPDATE ON "TEST"."NAMES"
FOR EACH ROW DECLARE REINDEX boolean := FALSE;
BEGIN
IF (inserting
OR updating('COMPOUND_NAME')
OR :new."COMPOUND_NAME" <> :old."COMPOUND_NAME") THEN REINDEX := TRUE;
END IF;
...
END;
You can see that the 12c Oracle Text version's AFTER trigger does actually compare the :new
and :old
values of the indexed column to see if it needs to update--not the case back in 2008.
So...if I'm updating the :new
value in my BEFORE trigger, that should be reflected in the AFTER trigger, and the comparison would kick off an update to the index. What gives?
Well, here are the two SQL statements I was using:
update test.names set
first_name = 'Skye',
last_name = 'Fillingim'
where ... ;
update test.names set
first_name = null,
last_name = null
where ... ;
(Slightly different than what I said in my question, I apologize.)
The effect here is that, each time I used one of these statements, either the :old.compound_name
or :new.compound_name
would be null. So when we get to this condition:
OR :new."COMPOUND_NAME" <> :old."COMPOUND_NAME"
We are doing an equality comparison against a null, which evaluates to UNKNOWN. Hence, no index update.
This is actually an extreme edge case, because you have to be indirectly modifying :new.column
via a trigger, and either :new
or :old
must be null. I would never have discovered it it I hadn't used those exact SQL statements.
So, we have a slight update to the trigger:
IF (inserting
OR updating('COMPOUND_NAME')
OR :new."COMPOUND_NAME" <> :old."COMPOUND_NAME"
OR (:new."COMPOUND_NAME" IS NULL AND :old."COMPOUND_NAME" IS NOT NULL)
OR (:new."COMPOUND_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND :old."COMPOUND_NAME" IS NULL)
) THEN REINDEX := TRUE;
And then just stick CREATE OR REPLACE
in front of the old trigger, recompile it, and everything works perfectly.
Best Answer
It's all preprocessing. PostgreSQL can do it's thing. You can do yours.
Exercise left to the OP,