Monitor Amazon RDS PostgreSQL Table Size with hot_standby_feedback

As of >= 1.3.1 Barman supports backup from a standby replica (concurrent_backup). Barman config, e.g. /etc/barman.d/standby.conf looks like this:

[standby]
description = "Replica of main PostgreSQL DB"
ssh_command = ssh postgres@db02
conninfo = host=db02 user=postgres
backup_options = concurrent_backup
streaming_conninfo = host=db02 user=postgres
streaming_archiver = on

If your master is running on PostgreSQL <= 9.5 you'd have to install pgespresso extension (there are binary packages e.g. for Debian from PGDG APT repos). PostgreSQL 9.6 introduced native streaming API, there's no need for special extension.

On standby server make sure to configure archive_command:

wal_level = hot_standby
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'rsync -a %p barman@backup:/var/lib/barman/standby/incoming/%f'

the incoming directory should match

barman:~$ barman diagnose | grep incoming_wals_directory

Also on standby server update pg_hba.conf (where 10.0.0.3 is ipaddress of barman server):

host   all             postgres            10.0.0.3/32        trust

And enable WAL files streaming:

barman~$ barman receive-wal standby

You can check your configuration using:

barman:~$ barman check standby

Server standby:
        PostgreSQL: OK
        wal_level: OK
        directories: OK
        retention policy settings: OK
        backup maximum age: OK (no last_backup_maximum_age provided)
        compression settings: OK
        failed backups: OK (there are 0 failed backups)
        minimum redundancy requirements: OK (have 1 backups, expected at least 0)
        ssh: OK (PostgreSQL server)
        pgespresso extension: OK
        archive_mode: OK
        archive_command: OK
        continuous archiving: OK
        archiver errors: OK

Then you should be ready to run full backup:

   barman:~$ barman backup standby

If I recall correctly, PostgreSQL now zeroes the end of the WAL segment after an archive timeout, before archiving the file. (Update): This is true for 9.4; for prior versions you still need to use pg_clearxlogtail utility to zero the end of any WAL segment as part of your archive script before you gzip your archive files.

In 9.4 and above you just need to gzip the file, with no need for pg_clearxlogtail.

The change was made commit 9a20a9b, but it's only in tag REL9_4_BETA1, so the change will first appear in 9.4:

commit 9a20a9b
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Date:   Mon Jul 8 11:23:56 2013 +0300

    Improve scalability of WAL insertions.

    This patch replaces WALInsertLock with a number of WAL insertion slots,
    allowing multiple backends to insert WAL records to the WAL buffers
    concurrently. This is particularly useful for parallel loading large amounts
    of data on a system with many CPUs.

    This has one user-visible change: switching to a new WAL segment with
    pg_switch_xlog() now fills the remaining unused portion of the segment with
    zeros. This potentially adds some overhead, but it has been a very common
    practice by DBA's to clear the "tail" of the segment with an external
    pg_clearxlogtail utility anyway, to make the WAL files compress better.
    With this patch, it's no longer necessary to do that.

BTW, you should really be using an archive timeout, rather than manually switching xlogs. Consider having a streaming replica for additional protection.

Update: As Jeff noted, pg_clearxlogtail hasn't been updated for 9.3. The incompatibility is very simple though; the definition of XLogRecPtr changed from

typedef struct XLogRecPtr
{
        uint32          xlogid;                 /* log file #, 0 based */
        uint32          xrecoff;                /* byte offset of location in log file */
} XLogRecPtr;

to

typedef uint64 XLogRecPtr;

when support for platforms with compilers that don't support 64-bit long integers was removed from PostgreSQL in 9.3. So all we need to do is add a macro or function that tests equality in a way that works for both.

The following patch adds support for 9.3, but is completely untested so use entirely at your own risk. If it eats your data then sets fire to your house, well, that's how things are. Patch here, as an attachment to the linked pgfoundry issue.