PostgreSQL – Function quote_nullable(timestamp without time zone) Not Unique

\df *crypt in psql reveals the argument types of the pgcrypto encrypt and decrypt functions (as do the PgCrypto docs):

                                List of functions
 Schema |      Name       | Result data type |   Argument data types    |  Type  
--------+-----------------+------------------+--------------------------+--------
 ...
 public | decrypt         | bytea            | bytea, bytea, text       | normal
 public | encrypt         | bytea            | bytea, bytea, text       | normal
 ...

so both the encrypt and decrypt functions expect the key to be bytea. As per the error message, "you might need to add explicit type casts".

However, it works fine here on Pg 9.1, so I suspect there's more to it than you've shown. Perhaps you have another function also named encrypt with three arguments?

Here's how it works on a clean Pg 9.1:

regress=# create table demo(pw bytea);
CREATE TABLE
regress=# insert into demo(pw) values ( encrypt( 'data', 'key', 'aes') );
INSERT 0 1
regress=# select decrypt(pw, 'key', 'aes') FROM demo;
  decrypt   
------------
 \x64617461
(1 row)

regress=# select convert_from(decrypt(pw, 'key', 'aes'), 'utf-8') FROM demo;
 convert_from 
--------------
 data
(1 row)

Awooga! Awooga! Key exposure risk, extreme admin caution required!

BTW, please think carefully about whether PgCrypto is really the right choice. Keys in your queries can be revealed in pg_stat_activity and the system logs via log_statement or via crypto statements that fail with an error. IMO it's frequently better to do crypto in the application.

Witness this session, with client_min_messages enabled so you can see what'd appear in the logs:

regress# SET client_min_messages = 'DEBUG'; SET log_statement = 'all'; 
regress=# select decrypt(pw, 'key', 'aes') from demo;
LOG:  statement: select decrypt(pw, 'key', 'aes') from demo;
LOG:  duration: 0.710 ms
  decrypt   
------------
 \x64617461
(1 row)

Whoops, key possibly exposed in the logs if log_min_messages is low enough. It's now on the server's storage, along with the encrypted data. Fail. Same issue without log_statement if an error occurs to cause the statement to get logged, or possibly if auto_explain is enabled.

Exposure via pg_stat_activity is also possible.. Open two sessions, and:

• S1: BEGIN;
• S1: LOCK TABLE demo;
• S2: select decrypt(pw, 'key', 'aes') from demo;
• S1: select * from pg_stat_activity where current_query ILIKE '%decrypt%' AND procpid <> pg_backend_pid();

Whoops! There goes the key again. It can be reproduced without the LOCK TABLE by an unprivileged attacker, it's just harder to time it right. The attack via pg_stat_activity can be avoided by revoking access to pg_stat_activity from public, but it just goes to show that it might not be best to send your key to the DB unless you know your app is the only thing ever accessing it. Even then, I don't like to.

If it's passwords, should you store them at all?

Furthermore, if you're storing passwords, don't two-way encrypt them; if at all possible salt passwords then hash them and store the result. You usually don't need to be able to recover the password cleartext, only confirm that the stored hash matches the password the user sends you to log in when it's hashed with the same salt.

If it's auth, let someone else do it for you

Even better, don't store the password at all, authenticate against LDAP, SASL, Active Directory, an OAuth or OpenID provider, or some other external system that's already designed and working.

Resources

• Secure Password authentication explained simply - CodeProject
• Wikipedia: Challenge-response authentication
• Wikipedia: Cryptographic hash function
• Wikipedia: Salt (cryptography)
• Wikipedia: Password

and lots more.

Can you format a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE column in a CREATE TABLE default constraint in Postgres v10.x?

No because that doesn't make any sense. Timestamps are stored as timestamps. It's a special type. You format things for display. Any point in time is stored the same way regardless. Formatting time should arguable not be done in the database at all.

Think of it like this, you may need Roman Numeral representation for some columns, but even if you do the database will stored integers in their binary representation.

Now if you want to change the clients default output formatting for timestamps, you can certainly do that. From the docs

The date/time style can be selected by the user using the SET datestyle command, the DateStyle parameter in the postgresql.conf configuration file, or the PGDATESTYLE environment variable on the server or client.