What is the database pattern called where (for example) the current price of a product is stored in one table, and when someone makes a purchase the current price of the product is copied to a line item table, and is redundant until the price changes?
Name of the product price, line-item database pattern
database-design
Related Solutions
I personally would use a model similar to the following:
The product table would be pretty basic, your main product details:
create table product
(
part_number int, (PK)
name varchar(10),
price int
);
insert into product values
(1, 'product1', 50),
(2, 'product2', 95.99);
Second the attribute table to store the each of the different attributes.
create table attribute
(
attributeid int, (PK)
attribute_name varchar(10),
attribute_value varchar(50)
);
insert into attribute values
(1, 'color', 'red'),
(2, 'color', 'blue'),
(3, 'material', 'chrome'),
(4, 'material', 'plastic'),
(5, 'color', 'yellow'),
(6, 'size', 'x-large');
Finally create the product_attribute table as the JOIN table between each product and its attributes associated with it.
create table product_attribute
(
part_number int, (FK)
attributeid int (FK)
);
insert into product_attribute values
(1, 1),
(1, 3),
(2, 6),
(2, 2),
(2, 6);
Depending on how you want to use the data you are looking at two joins:
select *
from product p
left join product_attribute t
on p.part_number = t.part_number
left join attribute a
on t.attributeid = a.attributeid;
See SQL Fiddle with Demo. This returns data in the format:
PART_NUMBER | NAME | PRICE | ATTRIBUTEID | ATTRIBUTE_NAME | ATTRIBUTE_VALUE
___________________________________________________________________________
1 | product1 | 50 | 1 | color | red
1 | product1 | 50 | 3 | material | chrome
2 | product2 | 96 | 6 | size | x-large
2 | product2 | 96 | 2 | color | blue
2 | product2 | 96 | 6 | size | x-large
But if you want to return the data in a PIVOT format where you have one row with all of the attributes as columns, you can use CASE statements with an aggregate:
SELECT p.part_number,
p.name,
p.price,
MAX(IF(a.ATTRIBUTE_NAME = 'color', a.ATTRIBUTE_VALUE, null)) as color,
MAX(IF(a.ATTRIBUTE_NAME = 'material', a.ATTRIBUTE_VALUE, null)) as material,
MAX(IF(a.ATTRIBUTE_NAME = 'size', a.ATTRIBUTE_VALUE, null)) as size
from product p
left join product_attribute t
on p.part_number = t.part_number
left join attribute a
on t.attributeid = a.attributeid
group by p.part_number, p.name, p.price;
See SQL Fiddle with Demo. Data is returned in the format:
PART_NUMBER | NAME | PRICE | COLOR | MATERIAL | SIZE
_________________________________________________________________
1 | product1 | 50 | red | chrome | null
2 | product2 | 96 | blue | null | x-large
As you case see the data might be in a better format for you, but if you have an unknown number of attributes, it will easily become untenable due to hard-coding attribute names, so in MySQL you can use prepared statements to create dynamic pivots. Your code would be as follows (See SQL Fiddle With Demo):
SET @sql = NULL;
SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT
CONCAT(
'MAX(IF(a.attribute_name = ''',
attribute_name,
''', a.attribute_value, NULL)) AS ',
attribute_name
)
) INTO @sql
FROM attribute;
SET @sql = CONCAT('SELECT p.part_number
, p.name
, ', @sql, '
from product p
left join product_attribute t
on p.part_number = t.part_number
left join attribute a
on t.attributeid = a.attributeid
GROUP BY p.part_number
, p.name');
PREPARE stmt FROM @sql;
EXECUTE stmt;
DEALLOCATE PREPARE stmt;
This generates the same result as the second version with no need to hard-code anything. While there are many ways to model this I think this database design is the most flexible.
Best Answer
Not every approach to common problems has a name. Certainly at least not a commonly agreed name. The term "design patterns" applies just as well to common database designs as it does to OOP. I would say data modellers are a little less enamoured with the idea of design patterns than OOP programmers.
I'm not familiar with a commonly agreed name for the design approach that you're describing. I call it transactional logging.
As an aside, the price in the sale item table is not technically redundant, even if the price hasn't changed. The price in the product table is the current book price, the price in the sale item table is the actual price charged. There is no way of knowing for sure what price was actually charged from looking at book price. Even if you have a book price history table it might have been possible, depending on your system's rules, for the price to be overridden manually. The two data attributes are semantically different, even if they happen to be coincidentally equal for some period of time.