MySQL: What happen when an executing sql’s client is terminated

This query fails on slave: 'insert into archieved(eid,at,rtime,scode) select id,at,avg(rtime),scode from tstatus where date(at)="2011-10-29" group by id'

You report a strange Error_code: 0, but try to run this query on slave? When it run succesfully then run as root:

SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER = 1;
SLAVE START;

There are situations where InnoDB deadlock would come up when you least expect it. For example, SELECT queries can perform locks on the gen_clust_index, aka the Clustered Index.

Here are three past questions I agressively looked over with @RedBlueThing, the person who asked these questions. @RedBlueThing found work arounds for his questions.

• Reasons for occasionally slow queries?
• Trouble deciphering a deadlock in an innodb status log
• Will these two queries result in a deadlock if executed in sequence?

Just to keep your question in perspective, when you look over these answers (don't look too deeply, even I get dizzy looking at my own convoluted answers) it should be quickly apparent that even SELECT queries can lock InnoDB data. Although autocommit could be enabled (rendering each query its own transaction), a single SQL statement can still be victimized by deadlocks.

You also have special cases of SELECT where you can lock specific rows on demand.

Based on InnoDB Deadlocking link, the sequences of event to cause this situation could theoretically be as follows:

• Your SQL UPDATEs a single row but generates an error
• The UPDATE causes a rollback of the one row
• The row has a lingering lock

Personally, that last statement scares me. It would have been nice for MySQL to inform everyone of this quirk instead of just documenting and hopong you google for it. Yet, that statement is from the MySQL Documentation. (Oh yeah, Oracle owns InnoDB)