It doesn't really make sense that you're able to do the backup with the --tab
option but not without it, and I think that should be investigated.
Concerns about integrity are generally concerns with the backup, and you should be concerned about the backup, because --single-transaction
issues a START TRANSACTION WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT
before the backup, ensuring that what gets written to the file represents the state of all the tables at one consistent point in time.
Without this, your "user" table, being alphabetically later than your "history" table could (for example) in the backup file contain a new user but not have caught history of that account's creation, since the backup of "history" finished before the backup of "user" was started.
You say you want to restore within a transaction, but that's not possible (by default) and probably not really what you intend at any rate.
It's not possible, by default, because of the way mysqldump
works. Examine a backup file
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `action`;
/*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client = @@character_set_client */;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
CREATE TABLE `action` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL ...
Both CREATE TABLE
and DROP TABLE
cause an implicit commit. This isn't the only concern, because non-conflicting writes to the tables could still be done by other threads.
There are two other ways to prevent changes on a MySQL server:
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
This attempts to close all tables and acquire a global lock that prevents any thread from writing. The problem here again in with the standard behavior of mysqldump
, and what it writes to the dump file for execution during the restore:
LOCK TABLES `action` WRITE;
/*!40000 ALTER TABLE `action` DISABLE KEYS */;
/*!40000 ALTER TABLE `action` ENABLE KEYS */;
UNLOCK TABLES;
These individual table locks are not compatible with the global lock:
mysql> flush tables with read lock;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.16 sec)
mysql> lock tables t1 write;
ERROR 1223 (HY000): Can't execute the query because you have a conflicting read lock
You can disable this behavior with --skip-add-locks
but then you wouldn't be able to write data into the tables if you had the global read lock because it prevents you from writing as well as other threads... so that one seems to be a non-starter.
Alternately, you could force the entire server to read_only
mode.
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK; -- force a wait until all ongoing writes have finished
SET GLOBAL READ_ONLY = 1; -- set entire server to read-only except for users with `SUPER` privilege
UNLOCK TABLES; -- release the global read lock
--- restore backup
SET GLOBAL READ_ONLY = 0;
If you're concerned with other threads modifying the tables during the restore, but you don't want the entire server to be read-only for the duration of the operation, I only see one really solid option, and that would be to restore all of the tables with an alternate name, and then, in a single SQL statement, rename them all to their correct names.
When multiple tables are renamed in a single statement, the entire statement is atomic.
RENAME TABLE t1 TO t1_old, t1_new to t1;
This acquires a global mutex that prevents t1 from being accessed until all of the renames are complete... but it would require manipulating your dump file to give the tables alternate names, thought it might also work if you restored to an alternate database name and renamed the tables in a fully-qualified form.
Another approach would be to drop and add all of the tables and lock all of them for write, before inserting the data, after removing any LOCK
and UNLOCK
from the dump file(s). The one additional step you'd need to do, here, would be after acquiring the locks, you'd need to run through every table and delete any data that got inserted by other threads between the time you created the table and acquired the locks, or the restore would fail. SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0
is a session-level setting that would allow your session to freely remove any stray data without regard to foreign key constraints.
The bottom line is that there is not a simple, straightforward way to keep all hands off of the data you are attempting to restore, and if faced with that requirement, I would be inclined to shut down the application server or otherwise prevent access to the server with a mechanism outside of mysql
itself, such as IP-level filtering.
Best Answer
PLEASE SEE MY WINDOWS ANSWER DOWN BELOW BY THE
UPDATE 2012-05-22 12:42 EDT
You need to make backups of each database separately
First, go get all your databases
BACKUP ALGORITHM #1
If you have a few databases to backup, you can dump all the databases is parallel:
BACKUP ALGORITHM #2
If there are too many databases to launch at the same time, dump 10 at a time:
BACKUP ALGORITHM #3
If there are simply way too many databases or the some of the databases are simply too large for frequent backups, you may want to think about making backups like this:
BACKUP ALGORITHM #2
That way, restoration of a database can be done in a point-in-time fashion.
For example, to get database
mydb
as for 2012-05-20 09:00:00 you do this:--start-datetime="2012-05-01 00:00:00"
--stop-datetime="2012-05-20 09:00:00"
--database=mydb
CONCLUSION
There may be other considerations to these scripts you may want to factor in. You may also want to use Open Source/Commerical programs to get the backups in the way most comfortable for you to use.
I would further recommend using MySQL Replication. That way these scripts can be executed on the Slave in this manner (as recommended in MySQL 5.0 Certification Study Guide, Page 462 Section 32.6 under the Heading "Replication as an Aid to Backup"):
This would also keep the backups from interefering with a production Master.
UPDATE 2012-05-22 12:42 EDT
Oh, you are running Windows 2008? That is a whole different ballgame.
I actually wrote a post in StackOverflow on dumping separate databases in Windows back in March of 2012.
I will post my answer from StackOverflow right now...
Have the information_schema database construct a DOS Batch File to perform the mysqldumps in parallel
Just run like any DOS Batch File
Make sure you have the correct username and password to connect to mysql
I just tried it out to make sure
Give it a Try !!!
EDIT By JakeJ:
When ran, the solution just outputted the data into CMD, then closed it without writing it to any file, however this now saves the data to the .SQL file created.