Some thoughts....
Typically one does not want to store pieces of tightly interrelated information in different systems. The chances of things getting out of sync is significant and now instead of one problem on your hands you have two. One thing you can do with Mongo though is use it to pipeline your data in or data out. My preference is to keep everything in PostgreSQL to the extent this is possible. However, I would note that doing so really requires expert knowledge of PostgreSQL programming and is not for shops unwilling to dedicate to using advanced features. I see a somewhat different set of options than you do. Since my preference is not something I see listed I will give it to you.
You can probably separate your metadata into common data, data required for classes, and document data. In this regard you would have a general catalog table with the basic common information plus one table per class. In this table you would have an hstore, json, or xml field which would store the rest of the data along with columns where you are storing data that must be constrained significantly. This would reduce what you need to put in these tables per class, but would allow you to leverage constraints however you like. The three options have different issues and are worth considering separately:
hstore is relatively limited but also used by a lot of people. It isn't extremely new but it only is a key/value store, and is incapable of nested data structures, unlike json and xml.
json is quite new and doesn't really do a lot right now. This doesn't mean you can't do a lot with it, but you aren't going to do a lot out of the box. If you do you can expect to do a significant amount of programming, probably in plv8js or, if you want to stick with older environments, plperlu or plpython. json is better supported in 9.3 though at least in current development snapshots, so when that version is released things will get better.
xml is the best supported of the three, with the most features, and the longest support history. Then again, it is XML.....
However if you do decide to go with Mongo and PostgreSQL together, note that PostgreSQL supports 2 phase commit meaning you can run the write operations, then issue PREPARE TRANSACTION and if this succeeds do your atomic writes in Mongo. If that succeeds you can then COMMIT in PostgreSQL.
MongoDB uses memory mapped files for performance I'll point you to a longer answer from me on this here but in essence large amounts of virtual memory usage are not something to worry about. In the case of virtual memory you'll see double usage with journaling, however this is less drastic then it sounds as the space is not actually used until there is an update. It is marked to the OS as being used despite being potentially empty when you start.
These aspects are all elements of how MongoDB uses the memory subsystem to provide performance, similarly to how it preallocates disk space to ensure these resources are marked and ready to serve your connections when they occur.
There's an interest presentation on MongoDB's storage layer that explains how the storage is managed and allocated, aggressively in most cases which tends to bump up these numbers.
Best Answer
@Marine1,You mongoimport syntax should be like as mention below example.
In the above example
testisdatabase name,stuffiscollection nameandEmployee.csvis the file which i want to import in MongoDB database through mongo shell. And theEmployee.csvfile location isC:\data\Employee.csv. In My case it has worked properly.In your case the syntax should be like that
The syntax should be in the above mention format, if you want to import the
headerof the file then mention--headerline.Note:- Make sure you are running the above mention script in inside the
BINof MongoDB Server.Very Important Note :
mongoimport would be to import a non-BSON file (such as JSON or CSV) into mongodb.