You can do it with PIVOT operator, but it require hardcoding all the pivoting values.
select * from (select Persnbr, Userfieldcd, value from pivot_test) pivot (max(value) for Userfieldcd in ('Port', 'Vip1'));
Building the query dynamically as your example:
declare
in_clause varchar2(256);
sel_query varchar2(256);
n number := 0;
begin
for x in (select distinct userfieldcd from persuserfield)
loop
if n <> 0 then
in_clause := in_clause || ', ';
end if;
in_clause := in_clause || '''' || x.userfieldcd || '''';
n := 1;
end loop;
sel_query := 'select * from (select Persnbr, userfieldcd, value from persuserfield) pivot (max(value) for userfieldcd in ('||in_clause||'));';
dbms_output.put_line (sel_query);
end;
/
If you don't want to interfere with other activity, the one UPDATE at a time in autocommit mode is very likely the best option. You should probably set synchronous_commit=off in that session (and only that session).
The indexes are going to slow you down, perhaps by a lot depending on your RAM and your IO system. But if the index is necessary for the other actions you don't want to interfere with, then there isn't anything you can do about it.
But since the fid is not yet correctly populated, the index on it is probably not actually useful to the concurrent processes you want avoid interfering with, as they haven't been changed yet to rely on that column being accurate. If that is the case, you can drop that index to gain speed, and build it in bulk later. The same probably applies to the foreign key constraint.
Once that index is gone, your updates can proceed via HOT (Heap Only Tuples) updates provided each block has enough free space. In that case, the updates will not have to do maintenance on the primary key index, either, saving that much more IO. To maximize the likelihood that this will work optimally, it is important that each UPDATE be its own transaction. That way one UPDATE can reuse space freed up by an earlier one.
Also, your WHERE clause should probably be like:
WHERE id=345 and fid is not null;
That way if the script gets interrupted, you can re-run it with minimal damage.
Since you seem to be running this on a test system already, then an EXPLAIN (ANALYZE,BUFFERS) of some of the updates would be helpful, especially with track_io_timing set to on.
Best Answer
You may use UDF to detect if a value can be treated as a number. Something like