FileVault 2 uses the GeneratedUID user attribute to save who is permitted to unlock an encrypted volume. If the GeneratedUID of a user differs from what was generated (or pulled from LDAP) when FileVault 2 was enabled, the user will not be permitted to unlock the machine, as their account will appear to be unavailable at the EFI menu. Also, this causes the crash of System Preferences on their Mac whenever they try to access the Security & Privacy prefpane.
This problem arises when /usr/bin/mcxrefresh
runs and pulls a null
value or a value different than what is stored locally from LDAP (if the attribute isn't defined for the user in question or is defined incorrectly, respectively), overwriting the GeneratedUID stored locally (which is generated and only stored locally when FileVault 2 is enabled without a matching LDAP attribute).
In other words, if an apple-generateduid value exists in LDAP for a user and is mapped properly on the users Mac to the GeneratedUID attribute, FileVault 2 will not generate a new value, but will instead use the value stored in LDAP.
I was able to resolve this issue by adding an attribute called apple-generateduid
to the LDAP entry of any user experiencing this issue. I could generate a random value for this attribute in Python by running the following one-liner from my terminal:
python -c 'import uuid; print str(uuid.uuid4()).upper();'
This isn't the only step, however. You must also add a mapping for this attribute on the client side. This is easily done using the following steps:
- Open System Preferences.
- Click Users & Groups.
- Click Login Options.
- Click on the Unlock Icon.
- Under Network Account Server, click Edit.
- Click to highlight your directory server.
- Under Services, double-click on your directory service (in my case, it was LDAPv3)
- In the window that slides open, highlight your configuration name, and then click the Edit... button.
- Under Search & Mappings scroll down and single-click on Users to highlight it.
- Click the Add button (the left one).
- Choose GeneratedUID from the list of available Attribute Types.
- In the right column, click the Add button, and type
apple-generateduid
. Click OK to save the changes until you're back at the main System Preferences dialog.
- At this point a mapping from GeneratedUID to
apple-generateduid
has been created. Now when OS X looks up the GeneratedUID value it will get the value of apple-generateduid from the user in questions LDAP entry.
Finally, it's important that the locally stored value of GeneratedUID and value stored on LDAP match. Run the following command and make sure the two GeneratedUID values match:
dscl /Search search /Users GeneratedUID $(dscl . read /Users/$(echo $USER) GeneratedUID | cut -d " " -f2)
Connecting to port 389 isn't wrong. It's actually "standards compliant". See RFC 4511 4.14 StartTLS Operation.
From the Wikipedia page:
"Servers also often support the non-standard "LDAPS" ("Secure LDAP", commonly known as "LDAP over SSL") protocol on a separate port, by default 636. LDAPS differs from LDAP in two ways: 1) upon connect, the client and server establish TLS before any LDAP messages are transferred (without a StartTLS operation) and 2) the LDAPS connection must be closed upon TLS closure.
...
LDAPS was used with LDAPv2, because the StartTLS operation had not yet been defined. The use of LDAPS is deprecated, and modern software should only use StartTLS."
iOS 6 account setup sends a starttls extended request on port 389 to the indicated server. Upon getting a success response the client (iOS in this case) initiates a tls handshake and if that completes the regular bind, etc. proceeds after that. So, the server must be able to handle both tls and non-tls connections on port 389.
Setup on the various servers is left as an exercise to the readers ;-)
So, iOS 5 and below used the LDAPS connection to port 686 but I guess iOS 6 is now "modern software".
FWIW, I think the startTLS operation is superfluous. Why even bother announcing to the world over an open channel what you are going to be doing inside a secure connection?
Best Answer
I was never able to get FileVault to work in an Enterprise configuration of OS X. So, I'll answer this as "not currently possible". Perhaps some later update of OS X...