How to connect three machines (Mini, 10.11; laptop, 10.12; iMac, 10.13) on two local networks, one wired and one WiFi, where local traffic is over wired connections and (external) Internet traffic is over WiFi? For context, assume the WiFi router is in another part of the building, wired connections to it are not an option and it is not under my control. The primary motivation is to do all file sharing among the three machines (TimeMachine backups and other networked file sharing) on higher bandwidth connections. What are the essential details of this configuration?
The Mini has 1 Ethernet port and 1 Thunderbolt port. The iMac has 1 Ethernet and 2 Thunderbolt ports. The laptop has only Thunderbolt ports (but one could always get a dongle). (All have Wifi.) The interface priority on all machines is set to: Thunderbolt, then (if on the machine) Ethernet, and then WiFi. Is this interface priority scheme helpful or counterproductive?
IP addresses for Thunderbolt and Ethernet are manually set to a subnet different than that of the the WiFi router (10.0.10.x, masked with 255.255.255.0, for wired local connections and 10.0.0.x for WiFi).
Option 1. Thunderbolt daisy chain. Can I daisy chain the local wired network and expect the endpoints to communicate via Thunderbolt cables: Mini (10.0.10.1) <-> iMac (10.0.10.2) and iMac (10.0.10.2) <-> laptop (10.0.10.3)? If yes, do I need to do anything specific to make this happen? For instance, on the laptop (and Mini) would I need to add something in the routing table (or other file) that says something like, "for all packets going to 10.0.10.x, use interface bridge0"?
Option 2. Direct connections for each pairing of machines. The machines could be connected in a triangular configuration: Mini (10.0.10.1) <-> iMac (10.0.10.2), iMac (10.0.10.2) <-> laptop (10.0.10.3), and Mini (10.0.10.1) <-> laptop (10.0.10.3). Given the available ports (see above), the model would then be to connect the Mini and iMac via Ethernet and connect the laptop to each other machine via Thunderbolt. Under this scenario, would the Ethernet and Thunderbolt interfaces need to be on separate subnets, i.e., : Mini (10.0.11.1) <-> iMac (10.0.11.2), iMac (10.0.10.2) <-> laptop (10.0.10.3), and Mini (10.0.10.1) <-> laptop (10.0.10.3)?
Best Answer
Note: Answer not complete....
"Local" Data
There's a bit of a rhetorical question here - what's local data? The answers will vary depending on how you see this whole thing configured however, we have to step away from that and look at from the perspective of the network.
In other words, "local data" is data that resides (is local to) that particular network. Let's look at your two networks:
10.0.10.0and10.0.11.0. We'll call them10.0and11.0, respectively for the sake of brevity.Traffic sent on
10.0to a particular node, say10.25is local to that network. Likewise, traffic sent on11.0on the same network is considered local to it. This is all traffic - web, ssh, ftp, smb, etc.Multiple Networks, Multiple Adapters
Can a node (computer) have two or more network adapters to connect to multiple networks? Sure!
You don't even need multiple adapters if your equipment makes use of 802.1Q VLAN (Virtual LAN) specification (we'll save that for another day). However, you can attach multiple network interfaces to a single node to access more than one network.
In this scenario, we have a single node with two network adapters connected to two different networks,
10.0and11.0.