I already have a lot of experience in Photoshop because I normally use it to edit my photos, but I've heard that Aperture is far better (or easier to use) than Photoshop. I started using the trial version but it's not that good. It's just like Lightroom. Is there any difference if i buy the full version? Also, does Aperture support plugins?
Aperture vs Photoshop
adobe-lightroomadobe-photoshopaperturephotos.app
Related Question
- Photoshop elements 11
- MacOS – Drag and drop from Photos.app to Photoshop
- Macbook Pro 15“ vs 13” – Performance vs portability
- Can Aperture open/view/edit a Photos library
- Issues rendering images when using any icc profile (including apple’s default). clipped dark areas. preview/quicklook shows wrong contrast
- MacOS – Android JPG images not opening in Photoshop
Best Answer
I'm currently making the transition from Lightroom over to Aperture. You are right in that Aperture is more like Lightroom than Photoshop. Its primary use is as a digital library for managing your photos, and videos. Much like iPhoto.
Lightroom and Aperture both have good editing functionality and both have the ability to use plugins for expanding the editing functions.
Both applications also allow non-destructive editing. Meaning you can always go back to the original image no matter what changes you do to the image within the application.
Aperture, like Lightroom, is designed with the photographer in mind. Digital assest management, photo editing, and exporting abilities for printing etc...
It's best to use either (or both) of these alongside Photoshop. I use Photoshop when it comes down to the heavy editing, or when I"m trying to do something more creative with the image outside the abilities of the other two applications.
I'm still learning Aperture so I cannot comment too much on its strengths and weaknesses vs Lightroom. Here is a post by Scott Bourne as to why he uses Aperture over Lightoom.
Hope some of what is here helps.